Vick claims he had no clue drugs and dog fighting were going on at his house in VA, that only his family lives at. Should he be held accountable?
2007-05-01 04:27:33 · 10 answers · asked by xwhyzguy78 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Well since it's his house he should at least know what's going on in that house. So yes he should be held accountable. Although he shouldn't take all of the punishment for it as hius family members are in the wrong as well.
2007-05-01 04:59:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Vick keeps having these little "bumps" in the road. I don't know, I mean the whole thing with the bottle at the airport and now this? Come on, it can't always be the whole "not sure" thing. If he keeps up, something will turn up and Vick will be having a a serious meeting with the commish.
2007-05-01 11:43:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Michael Vick also doesn't realize that he runs around with the ball too long in one hand, and fumbles it every damn time he gets hit!
2007-05-01 11:57:51 · answer #3 · answered by italsteel1 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Lets see,..He is not responsible 4 his stats!,..His team who sucks!,Drugs at an airport!(in his water bottle)!!,..Dogs fighting,killing themselves(in his house)!!,..his coaches losing their jobs!!!,..that's what The Falcon fans will preach too their blue in he face!!!,..The truth is,..he is worse than Moss is!!!,..this dude is a loser,it runs in his family,that's why his brother doesn't start in the NFL,he messed up too!!!,..He's GUILTY!!!!,..dont care what the Falcon fans have to say!!!!
2007-05-01 12:16:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
He is the most overrated player in the NFL. He doesn't have a clue alright. He is Ron Mexico!
2007-05-01 11:43:59 · answer #5 · answered by sowhat 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No!! accountable for what?why?because he is Micheal Vick that's not a good enough reason for me. because he owns the house? that's not a good enough reason either. its a damn shame when we as Americans try to MAKE individuals guilty of things that they normally wouldn't be.to anyone who answers yes to this question you got a new person to point your finger at while you act like your an angel.
2007-05-01 11:42:17 · answer #6 · answered by Thump 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Well, he wasn't there supposedly, but it being his house, he has to be held accountable as to who is on his property...
2007-05-01 11:41:17 · answer #7 · answered by Terry C. 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes....how can you have 30 something dogs in your house and not know about it...lol
2007-05-01 11:35:43 · answer #8 · answered by . 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Its his house, in his name so yes. if it was your house or mine, it would be boarded up as a drug house. Why not his.
2007-05-01 11:33:51 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like he should be.
2007-05-01 11:30:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋