In 2006, terror attacks increased another 25% and the number of deaths increased by 40%.
http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/69479.pdf
American intelligence agencies say the invasion and occupation of Iraq has created a new generation of Islamic radicalism and that the overall terrorist threat has grown since the Sept. 11 attacks.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/world/middleeast/24terror.html?ei=5088&emc=rs&en=da252be85d1b39fa&ex=1316750400&partner=rssnyt
2007-05-01 03:16:19 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Byakuya ---
The administration restricted press access as soon as the military reached Baghdad. Remember all of those ‘embedded” reporters – where are they now?
I guess you must be referring to the ‘imaginary press’ who were covering the ‘imaginary terrorists’ that were in Iraq before Bush invited the real ones in to kill Americans.
2007-05-01 03:39:03 · update #1
Sounds like its going badly.
2007-05-01 03:37:07 · answer #1 · answered by kirbyguy44 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Seems to me an Imaginary Al Qaeda General Abu Al-Masri was killed by Imaginary Sunni Tribesmen in the Imaginary Anbar Province. The Imaginary Sunni Tribesmen are doing a Great Job killing the Imaginary Al Qaeda in Iraq aiding US Forces defeating the Democrats and Their Arab Islamist allies.
2007-05-01 04:48:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ALthough not a neocon, whatever that means, I thought I would share some truth with you, it is going really well, we need more boots on the ground but the guys there are doing a terrific job.
If you want the truth you can find it at http://www.billroggio.com/
although I doubt you will read any of it as I doubt you are even a citizen of the USA
2007-05-01 05:33:52 · answer #3 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the military needs to kick the press out of Iraq so they can fight without being under a magnifying glass.. they're all so worried about whether or not the public approves of their actions that they can't do what needs to be done to win the war.. we're trying to win "honorably" but you can't win a war by fighting honorably.. the history books describe the winners as having fought honorably, but that's because the winners write the history books..
I was going by what I read in this post: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AkpaO2vpdt7kl5b.Yc0BxVPty6IX?qid=20070427083150AAr9Vli&show=7#profile-info-KmTX0MCKaa
2007-05-01 03:27:56 · answer #4 · answered by Byakuya 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You do know what a "neocon" is, don't you?
They are social liberals who favor intervening with the U.S. armed forces overseas to defeat human rights abusers.
It amuses me to no end to see one group of libs berate another.
2007-05-01 03:55:40 · answer #5 · answered by A Balrog of Morgoth 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hussein declared a Jihad this united all the Muslims in the world. You hurt one brother in Iraq and you also hurt all Muslims. The terrorist is going to get worse as we have stirred up a hornets nest.
2007-05-01 03:30:07 · answer #6 · answered by lonetraveler 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Great! Increased intensity is a sure sign of desperation. Reports coming in today say that insurgents are turning on each other (Abu Ayyub al-Masri)!
Thanks for asking!
2007-05-01 03:20:56 · answer #7 · answered by Cherie 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
A new leader of al Queda in Iraq will just take the old one's place, if he hasn't already. Same old story, same old strategy from Bush.
2007-05-01 03:21:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
What do you expect from the NY times and left wing liberal organizations?
2007-05-01 03:44:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Osama doesn't even have to hide from America. Bush's attention is not even on him.
Neocons conveniently forget their President's promise to capture the murderer.
Shame on you, Neocons.
2007-05-01 03:19:43 · answer #10 · answered by Magma H 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋