English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

THOUGHT PREDICTOR is at http://wwf.edula.com/tp

2007-05-01 02:59:48 · 3 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

3 answers

cool site. not everybody thinks the same thoughts though.

2007-05-01 03:18:44 · answer #1 · answered by Wait a Minute 4 · 0 0

Since time dimension has no meaning for thought, it can always beat any predictor that is bound by time.

2007-05-01 10:06:51 · answer #2 · answered by small 7 · 0 0

THOUGHT PREDICTOR has no calculator, no ability to calculate, no thought process of its own, no ability to identify nor differentiate, no process for its question and no process for its answer. It is system but not process system. A system moves a thing, a process changes a thing or creates a thing. System moves things for process and process is guidance of system for creating, identifying and differentiating things for their kind (placement for thing to sub-directory). It has no self identification nor purpose and rules for its purpose. It does not evidence personal memory nor learning.

Part One of the Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences: The Logic

First Subdivision
VII. BEING

(c) Being-for-self

'The readiest instance of Being-for-self is found in the ‘I’. We know ourselves as existents, distinguished in the first place from other existents, and with certain relations thereto. But we also come to know this expansion of existence (in these relations) reduced, as it were, to a point in the simple form of being-for-self. When we say ‘I’, we express this reference-to-self which is infinite, and at the same time negative. Man, it may be said, is distinguished from the animal world, and in that way from our nature altogether, by knowing himself as ‘I’: which amounts to saying that natural things never attain free Being-for-self, but as limited to Being-there-and-then, are always and only Being for another.'

http://www.marxists.org/reference/archiv...

http://www.marxists.org/reference/archiv...

2007-05-01 22:25:17 · answer #3 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers