Which person would damage the U.S. more: President Hitlery Klinton or President Osama Obama?

Question

Before anyone jumps my case about calling Obama, Osama, Democrat Senator Ted Kennedy did it first.

http://tinyurl.com/3b3jbt

.

Answer 1

They are both Marxist -Socialists.
My guess is Obama would be worse because he is crafty at disguising his Marxist agenda as being good for America. He is a skilled liar. He could care less about America and its Constitution.
Clinton is not so skilled at lying. You can see through her agenda more easily. She would also be more likely to defend America but only after an attack.
Be smart. Vote fore someone who has respect for our Constitution and the principles set forth by our founding fathers.

Answer 2

I would not vote for either one, but I believe Hillary would be worse. I do not believe there will be a Clinton/Obama ticket. I think Hillary is too cautious a politician to try to break two barriers in one election.If she wins the nomination she will probably select Bill Richardson for her VP. This would in a way also break a barrier- first Hispanic VP, but not as dramatic as an African American choice. If Hillary is the nominee, the Republican choice- hopefully McCain or Giuliani should select a woman for VP. That would take some of the wind out of Hillary's sails.

Answer 3

First Teddy needs to shut up. This is tough question. Hillery is a closer and gets the job done and Obama is going to be a great Stateman but needs the experience. If he do like Reagan and talk to the American people on what he needs then he would be a Great President

Answer 4

What an ignorant question!Either would help to try and rebuild this mess after corrupt Republican rule.They had total control of all three branches of the judicial system for 6 (LONG) years and have made a mockery and a sham of the United States.We're over 8 trillion in debt from a record surplus (400 billion)left by Clinton.Thousands dead,etc.etc.etc.etc.etc.etc.etc.

Answer 5

through fact they are embarrassed by using the Bush administrations loss of concentration getting the terrorists and diverting our pronounced purpose by using going into Iraq for the incorrect motives and forsaking the seek in Afghanistan to kill each and every final terrorist. they are ashamed yet won't admit it. Bush became into the incorrect guy on the incorrect time. He particularly f****D up this usa by using dropping 3 trillion funds of OUR funds and putting us in severe debt that we will could desire to war for years and years to get out of. He became into a minimum of as undesirable to the conservative circulation as Nixon.

Answer 6

Both are horrible. Vote Ron Paul in 2008.

Answer 7

Non, they would both do the country a lot of good.

See what the Republicans did to America this past 6 years. Bush child totally alienated America and make US of A the laughing stock at the U.N.
There is a huge lack of respect worldwide.
I can't wait for a change in leadership in Democrats favor.

"Happy days, are here again......"

Answer 8

I think hilary is amoral and unethical. She is a glory hound. I do not trust her at all. I think Obama is inexperienced. With that said.... I would prefer Obama. At least he seems to have some ethics, as opposed to clinton. I get the feeling that he at least would think things through. I would prefer honest mistakes made from someone who was stand up, than someone who was in it for herself. I know, lots of thumbs down coming my way, but hey, you asked.

Answer 9

What damages this country the most is mentally challenged, hate-mongering bigots such as yourself.

Why don't you emigrate? Tell me where to mail the tickets to Siberia.

Answer 10

Both would make good Presidents, they sure couldn't do as bad as President Bush has with our Foreign policies.