Are male-female seggregated societies unnatural/ oppressive or are heterosexual ones?

Question

In mammals the original lifestyle consists of totally seggregated male and female spaces as represented by one of the oldest mammals ----- the elephants.

Mammals have no social pressures to do so. Males and females instinctively prefer that.

It is the same-sex sexual bonds that keep these male-only/ female only spaces strong and livable.

However, some males (around 5%) are exclusively 'heterosexual' (sic) & they need to live with females. Since they can't they become loners (as in elephants).

But, in species (such as horses or lions) where the females become weak (due to weakened same-sex bonds) these 5% males + 7% to 10% others who are predominantly so-called 'heterosexual', control these female spaces as harems.

That's the only heterosexual space that we know of in the natural mammalian setting (including tribal humans).

Males, especially love and need their male-only spaces. Destroying these spaces by heterosexualising them is the bigggest but unacknowledged....

.....and thus invisible oppression of men.

Heterosexual human social spaces are the root of all major social problems including the visible oppression of woemn and the invisible oppression of men.

E.g. when a male is forced (by psycho-social pressures) to marry and live with a woman, which is against the core of his nature, he may take out his frustration on the woman through violence (because she's weak physically).

Male spaces ------ whether in humans or animals can be heterosexualised only after males have been sufficiently weakened/ demasculated by breaking them from each other ------ as in the west.

Heterosexual spaces are unnatural and oppressive both for men and women, but in the present situation, especially for men.

What do you think?

Those who reply without reading, their answers do not count

solver,
Its really a pity if you think that humans are beyond nature.

It is an unfortunate attitude created first by Christianity which has led to several devastating developments in the west, including the invention of environment harming 'science', of unnatural heterosexual spaces and of 'sexual orientation', of industrialisation and all that humans could do without.

Answer 1

Not sure if this is really a question.

Anyway...

If the people in a society find the society oppressive, then it is oppressive. Societies that force people to always interact in certain ways, whether that has to do with peoples genus or other aspects of their lives, are oppressive.

Whether the society is natural or not is not really a helpful question - we are, due to the advanced level of our culture and society, beyond "nature" in many ways.

Answer 2

Did you have a question? Or just need a forum for your particular sexist opinions?