English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

At last, Cricket Chief Malcolm Speed Conceded on Sunday that the 2007 World Cup would be chiefly remembered chaotic finish of the final & Death of Bob Woolmer.

Why he went on to commit wrong choice?

2007-04-30 21:24:42 · 9 answers · asked by ♥SMARNY♥ 6 in Sports Cricket

9 answers

My guess was that the final was scheduled for Saturday in the caribbean because it would have been Sunday in other parts of the world, Asia, Australia, England, and the ICC were looking for tv viewership (that's where the money is). If it was held on the Sunday in the caribbean then a lot of persons would not have stayed up to look at it cos they probably had to work that day or the next day or something like that.
It's just a thought.

2007-05-01 19:41:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

BURNING BRIGHTLY shut you fu..ing mouth!What did u say???? huh??You said " It was the right choice cant you see the Aussies won all this is a very stupid attempt to explain the mediocre very poor skills of one of the most laughable cricket teams ever to play in the World Cup being the Sri Lankan dopes ~~HaHa Ha Ha".

Im not gonna comment on what u said coz everybody knows how good sri lankan cricket team is.If ur talking like that we can call u as UK prisoners.Whats ur history??You got expelled from them huh.Dont make stupid comments.

Well yes I firmly believe they should have gone for sunday to have the finals coz i dont believe that saturdays match was not a proper cricket match.If its a 50 over game yes definitely 50 overs have to be played.Some say that if they played all 50 overs they would have scored over 400 i believe no.Coz if it was 50 overs i dont believe that aussiees would have started of that violently since they have 50 overs.Their approach would have been different.We all know sri lankans are much better players when they play whole 50 overs.History proves that sri lanka hasnt won a single match where overs were reduced.


Eventually we must admit that aussiees were luckier and superior to us on that day but its people lik BURNING BRIGHTLY WHO MAKE STUPID COMMENTS MAKE US HATE AUSSIEEES.

2007-05-01 11:43:07 · answer #2 · answered by SOAD_ROX 2 · 3 0

yes girl yours is a timely question
I think when "Gill" drank some fluids which
brought by Autralian reserved player,
might have given him this power hitting ability


Gichrist did illegal thing
me think when "Gilcriss drank some fluids which
brought by Autralian reserved player,
might have given him this big hitting power
Law 3 (6) (c) (i) specifically prohibits a player from using equipment other than that permitted. And nowhere in cricket’s 42 laws is there a mention of a squash ball as a permitted item.

sri lanka could have won under better circustances,

if it was a 50 over match
if the weather was better.

this was the only match in the world cup it wasnt 50 overs. they should have postponed it for the next day or a day the weather was good.

Ultimately....rain & light chaos prevented
Sri Lanka from winning the World cup 2007
still some fans demand srilakns
shut their mouth about this UNJUST....
At least these fans ~criss and ~sord rox and lara king~
doing something against this ~disgusting unjust
thanx again guys
we dont worship Kangaroos
we worship .. only god

2007-05-04 02:03:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Honestly, now I am with answerer>"soad rox".. cuz australian supporters now beginning to show their "Wolfish- attitde "under sheep skin.
Ya you all are decendent from British expelled ancestors.
Soo, their reply to some questions obviously show how low Oz people can get.
i may call it "Unfathomable dark PAST" Of Oz.

So gilchrist doing some violation of Cricket rules...
is not a New thing . It's in Their genes.
They really Can't Help it.
Putting a Squash Ball in a Batting Glove is illegal
by ICC laws.Infact any thing...But one Ausie did it.
So keep your mouth shut about it........!!!
that's why i say ,..This was a "Staged -drama" to award Australia the 2007 world Cup.
no body like to accuse gilchrist nor australia.
whem Cronje did this it was abig hue & cry.
when Asie does that everybody accept it.
too bad man, disguting.but now
some people start to say it was More ....Like "WWF"- Wrestling Drama, everything went on according to the script.Whilst I am not that happy nesessarily, that Australia has won the World Cup.But I feel for Sri Lanka who never really had a decent chance to chase the Australian's total. A "Terrible end to a Disappointing" World Cup which has done nothing to advance the game.
I believe that Australia is fighting unit and would have not beaten Srilanka over 50 overs.But having the final reduced to 38 overs and then played in the dark was a Joke.

Both teams should be given a fair opportunity. I ask the Sri Lankan supporters who have been so outspoken in their dispair of Australian supporters (only gentemen-not some good 4 nothing hooligans) not to blame Ausies for this farce.

Instead Blame the ICC who seem to make up rules as they go along. Personally I would have liked to see the match moved to Sunday so that we could have a real game of cricket and not the joke that ensued.
AUS got WC 2007 , but SL played under pressure.When the Final was on the same time their Capital city was attacked by Terrorists.Rain took over the match.
"Toss' was the ridiculously deciding Facter.
Sri Lankan Players got the ....................
"Terrorists attacking Colombo"- news and Panicked ..
and that did not exactly helped to Lankan course to Victory
much.

Their(Cricketers) kids wives & parents all living in Colombo.
They dont know how far it affected ,towards > target & Bad light as well as Rain.
ICC must answer this question. I dont know these whyICC morons did not call this game to next day?
Utter non sense..!!
And even limit the final to 25 overs. ( In rainy day even kid knows dark will come soon in evening )
Begining ICC has to limit this game to 25 overs or call to next day.
But ICC & organizers want "Business" than the cricket game.
No doubt AUS is a good team.
So how SL or any other team can face "OZ" in bad lights?
This is the worst game I ever saw. Organisers had no common sense at all. they did according to the "Script" that Somehow or other "Australia must Win"
We were in no need of the victory so badly like Australia.
But we don't want like this stupid End either.

we did not bribe Umpires.we didnot Bragged either.
I again wish,Long live asian Cricket.
It can hurt ausies a bit ,i surely know.But ICC descrimination towards Asian players ? Can it be Pardened?
Dissapointing world cup Ever....2007
now every body jump to say dont blame
on these Noble Australians.
Oh phuleeeze .. gimme a break...!!..What a hypocracy,
what i can not understand is some Asian peolpe seems deaf & bling about this

when in Australia once Murali Was bowling The Racist australian crowd shouted that " no Ball".-.".no ball"
Daryl hair is only one of them too.
In that Cursed Australian Cricket Match >
whenever Muralitharan took the Ball..
these so called Noble Australian Racist shouted
" no Ball"...." NO ball"...
they chanted all the while.
anybody ,objected?
I dont think so...Sir..I dont think so...Sir

Have any stood up against it ?SOME Fans..EH?
some cricket loving fans...
Parden them? you gonna say that?
when we now criticize them what they do?
They use dirty language..They use dirty language..
But.. they get away all the time..why?
Cuz they R so good at acting Innocent.....
Squash ball or Alien ball , dont Talk.
cuz Australians did it .
what ever it's Australia..you R supposed to
shut your ****...about it.
They Literally robbed (Loot) the Cup from SriLankans.
Everybody Silent?
OK
Hail to Thee.. The Galent Sri Lankans(Lions)
Hip Hip Hurray

2007-05-01 16:39:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

The dateof the final was decided much earlier. Who knew when the date was fixed that it will rain that day. While I fully agree that Sunday was the ideal choice, they may have fixed the final on Saturday, so that if by any chance final could not be played on Saturday, it can be played on Sunday instead of any week day.

2007-05-01 10:06:49 · answer #5 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 2 0

It was the right choice cant you see the Aussies won all this is a very stupid attempt to explain the mediocre very poor skills of one of the most laughable cricket teams ever to play in the World Cup being the Sri Lankan dopes ~~HaHa Ha Ha.

2007-05-01 06:17:42 · answer #6 · answered by burning brightly 7 · 0 6

Well hes right..no wrong choice. I will certainly remember this, and so will you.

2007-05-01 05:11:42 · answer #7 · answered by brissy_006 5 · 0 0

Disastrous end to a disastrous cup....what else....

2007-05-01 10:30:04 · answer #8 · answered by Santosh 3 · 0 0

so then y didnt they cancel da match on sat?

2007-05-01 13:58:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers