were terrorists in Iraq before we invaded? And if those reasons for going to war don't really exist then why is the U.S. still there? And why isn't someone catching some serious heat for this big screwup?
2007-04-30 20:49:57 · 11 answers · asked by steele_cd 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Uh no. You were obviously too busy hating the war and President Bush to watch the press conference where he admitted there wasnt a connection. I feel like any answer I give you wont be satisfactory for you so just go ahead and say what you will.
2007-04-30 20:59:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I for one don't think Saddam had anything to do with 9/11, the 19 guys who struck were Saudi's.
But it was proven Saddam had WMD's he gassed the kurds, this was not laughing gas.
I think now our goal was o attack a weaker country in Iraq and be right next door to Iran, we planned on things going better thinking the Iraqi's would welcome us in,problem is we did not factor in the majority being Shiites and that Iran is Shiites, they are the one pulling the strings.
Why is it that Bush is the evil one and not the terrorist?
They hit us before he took office, then why does he get all the blame?
Clinton had Osama in his sights why did he not kill the bastard?
I think Al-qeada is a threat but not the biggest, Iran who funds Hamas and Hezbollah is a bigger threat to world peace, give it time we will see another attack but this time it will be bigger, lookat what the public did with Katrina, just thinkwhat will happen if a nuke goes off or something biological. we would be done for.
Then who will we blame? Hillary or Obama, it wont be their fault either, just the public who demamded that we withdraw from the very region that is the sponsor of world terrorism.
2007-05-01 04:13:51 · answer #2 · answered by Jack L. W. 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
At least 3 terrorist leaders were hiding in Iraq during Saddam's rule. Add to that the training camp at Salmon Pak trained 8000 terrorists of nearly every Muslim Nation and yes I believe that Saddam was involved with terrorism up to his ***.
2007-05-04 23:17:27 · answer #3 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they shipped all MD to Iran and other countries we are not going to let some crazy lunatic DE stabilize the worlds oil supply you people can not govern yourselves you dont see radical factions in our country fight ing we want peace more than anything you dont have any idea what your talking about we want more than anything to leave Iraq and Afghanistan but those wackos want chaos so they have something to do
2007-05-01 04:20:42 · answer #4 · answered by Are we using our brains today 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, there are people who still believe that. And also they believe that Saddam was involved with 9/11.
The administration's reason for our being there changes frequently. And they are catching heat--finally.
2007-05-01 03:53:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Yeah, it's kinda weird how osama just suddenly disappeared and government officials just stopped looking for him....he's still out there and im sure the people of Afghanistan are pretty pissed we invaded their land and continue to blow it up. Don't think that Al-quida isn't planning revenge. nuke??
2007-05-01 03:57:10 · answer #6 · answered by **AqUaRiUs cHiCk** 2 · 1⤊ 5⤋
NO the U.S. just needed to have justification for doing exactly what they do best. Invade.
2007-05-01 03:59:03 · answer #7 · answered by Jammie_♥ 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Because the man who deserves the heat is still running the country.
2007-05-01 03:52:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
You poor pathetic people still don't get it.
2007-05-01 04:24:09 · answer #9 · answered by DixeVil 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah the criminal is still leading that country.
many dies for one man greedy
2007-05-01 04:14:25 · answer #10 · answered by Khala 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋