2007-04-30 17:26:31 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I think it would be bad for the USA. We have had 4 years of Bush Sr., 8 years of Bill Clinton, and almost 8 years of Bush Jr.
We seriously need new blood in the White House. When Bush Jr. steps down it will have been 20 years of two families controlling the executive branch.
I think Democracy is healthy when we get a new influx of leadership. I believe "more of the same" is bad for our society.
2007-04-30 18:13:49 · answer #1 · answered by professional student 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think it will be the beginning of the end of the United States. Hillary Clinton is not interested in serving the greater good she is only interested in serving Hillary Clinton. Just like all the rest of the career politicians on both sides. Bush may have been wrong about quite a few things but at least he stood up for what he believed and hasn't backed down. Hillary on the other hand will tell you what ever you want to hear to get your vote, then she'll move to the next person and tell him/her something entirely different to win their vote. In the end she'll acomplish nothing because she's afraid to take a stand. After 9/11 she supported the war. When we first went into Iraq she supported that, now she says she's against it, yet Congress keeps funding the war.
2007-04-30 17:45:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Won't happen. She will lose in a landslide. Not enough men will pull the trigger in the privacy of the voting booth.
Plus, 8 years is enough Bill & Hil. Can we have someone not named Clinton or Bush be president? It's been 16 years. Time to move on. The country needs someone to unite the people and be respected. The Clintons and the Bushes have been in power long enough.
2007-04-30 17:42:06 · answer #3 · answered by fugazi 1 · 6⤊ 2⤋
I would like to have a female president, but Hillary is not one I would vote for. She tells everyone what they want to hear-just watch her speeches-she contradicts herself all the time.
Obama is who I'm voting for.
Here's a video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rapaWbPRj3Y
To find out more about him: go to BarackObama.com or read "The Audacity of Hope"
2007-04-30 19:19:28 · answer #4 · answered by Frances 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She would be a horrible president. You can't trust her. Her positions change daily. We already pay too much in taxes, look for that to significantly increase if she is elected. I find it laughable that she is the best the dems have to offer.
2007-04-30 18:57:13 · answer #5 · answered by Ryan H 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A very serious answer. She cannot win.
Why? She is not really liked except for those who liked her terrible husband.
Next. She pretends not to be, but she is a far left and very scary and dangerous liberal.
2007-05-02 08:21:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Too divisive a figure. Won't be able to win the general election unless some independent or third party candidate can get votes from the Republican, just like Bill won.
I don't like her, don't trust her, feel she is too much of a politician, she's fake, eliteist, caniving, and annoying. And I'm a liberal.
2007-04-30 17:40:44 · answer #7 · answered by Frank 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
No means no,to bad Bill didn't know that.Even my mother who is life long Dem won't vote for her.
2007-04-30 18:10:49 · answer #8 · answered by ak6702 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am all for having a female president...but I do NOT want Hillary to be the first female president!
2007-04-30 17:29:42 · answer #9 · answered by ♥Jara-Lee♥ 3 · 6⤊ 5⤋
If she be able to spend money to create JOBS instead of WAR and Arm Forces, certainly would get many votes
2007-04-30 18:09:42 · answer #10 · answered by Richard 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋