Of couse, we know Bush and Rove will only be in her book if she also employed gay prostitutes.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/28/ross-white-house-madam/
2007-04-30
14:42:07
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
As for there being democrats and liberals in her book – it depends on whether they are pitifully pious and pathologically faithful hypocrites like immorally superior conservatives.
2007-04-30
14:51:37 ·
update #1
stinker0… ---
I used to live 20 miles south of DC, and I don’t remember prostitution being legal there.
2007-04-30
14:53:40 ·
update #2
Sheepdog --
How did I insult anyone other than Bush and Rove; and their hypocrisy?
Don’t lay your personal bigotry and prejudice at my doorstep.
2007-04-30
15:01:57 ·
update #3
-------------------------------
Calee --
Thank God, another Earthling.
I never used to believe all that space-alien crap until reading what the critters on YA had to say.
And then there is this:
On July 8, 1947, witnesses claimed that an unidentified object with five aliens aboard crashed onto a sheep and cattle ranch just outside Roswell, New Mexico. This is a well-known incident that many say has long been covered up by the U.S. Air Force and the US government.
However, what you may NOT know is that in the month of March 1948, exactly nine months after that historic day, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, and Dan Quayle were all born.
See what happens when aliens breed with sheep.
2007-05-01
12:01:29 ·
update #4
The best part of this story is the guy who Bush put in
charge of getting rid of prostitution was a part of this
escort service.
I have to disregard liberals from this simply because
they don't go around preaching & looking to make law
against it - they are more concerned with the lives we
are losing in Iraq right now.
And I don't think you're slamming homsexuals, I believe
you mentioned them only because Bush & Cheney deny
them rights, then allow one to visit the WH over 200 times.
Then there are their friends, Mark Foley & Ted Haggard.
2007-04-30 15:27:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
basically a side theory right here. The Obama administration is going to maintain pushing and pushing in an attempt to make us react. We shouldn't. this is precisely what they want. For the final 2 years Glenn Beck has been preaching that the 1st element to pass violent, loses, considering that element will lose credibility with the yank public. In such an ecosystem I advise we undergo in strategies the lesson taught by Martin Luther King Jr. Non-violence. Take the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune and show that we are dignified people who will face up to Tyranny by lawful ability.
2016-12-10 15:58:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by embrey 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You slam homosexuals and issue seditious statements at the same time. A new low!
Yes, sedition is no longer illegal and is protected under free speech. It's still contemptible. You could have made the same point without it. You chose not to.
I'm a democrat. But I'm an American citizen, FIRST.
We have free speech as well. Expect us to answer the people who seditiously attack our elected representatives (not dissent/disagree/protest their actions, as that can be a patriotic act as well).
2007-04-30 14:57:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
We do not know who is in the book and frankly, who cares? With the world falling apart and America boys dying I should give a damn about a book with names in it. Guys will be guys so screw the book and let's get back to business. Incidentally, I was told that Hillary's name is in the book.
2007-04-30 20:24:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oooh, how interesting.
You, a LIBERAL, are using HOMOSEXUALITY as an INSULT!!!
That's not very "tolerant" of you, is it? You hypocrite!
And, as a Conservative, the only thing I find outrageous about this "DC Madam" scandal is that her business is illegal in the first place. While I certainly don't advocate treating sex as a commodity, I fail to see how I have any right to tell a woman that she can't take payment for getting laid.
2007-04-30 14:46:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
She's going to go down before she gets to far with this and who would believe anything ABC has to say?? As for neocons being bothered I'd worry more about the liberals, if that kind of thing bothers liberals.
2007-04-30 15:00:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Brianne 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
curious,,I live way out in the woods and usually I get the mail about a month late but,,,
did these people sign in,,,or does she have pictures,, or did she just make up the list???
PEOPLE we just came off the duke thing,,when proven guilty ,then I will talk about them,,until then,,what's the purpose??
2007-04-30 15:50:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by jose 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
its going to get very interesting. Hope Palfrey avoids small aircraft.
2007-04-30 14:47:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Please it's all public knowledge about how many repukes are and have been charged with sexual crimes and mostly with kids but hey their still are holding jobs in the white house so what about this!
2007-04-30 15:12:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by sally sue 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
doesn't bother me, family values is only a propaganda slogan, a lie to trick the proles
2007-04-30 14:46:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋