no charges no indictments. i think it's a waste of taxpayer's money.
2007-04-30 14:25:52 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
the money spent was directly trying to take down the clintons. the others who were charged and convicted were going down eventually....certainly no need for 70 million dollars.
2007-04-30 14:31:13 · update #1
why hire three separate independent investigators?
2007-04-30 14:35:16 · update #2
Yeah well the government is good at wasting money.
2007-04-30 14:27:42 · answer #1 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Ranks right up there with the wasting of 90 million they spent to find out if Monica really gave him the B.J.
2007-04-30 21:33:17 · answer #2 · answered by doctdon 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You're statement is incorrect. Whitewater's investigation did produce numerous indictments and prison terms. Not of BJ Clinton or Hillary, but several others were convicted of crimes; people lost a lot of money thank to them.
2007-04-30 21:29:15 · answer #3 · answered by netjr 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
There was nothing "pseudo" about it. Clintons have mastered the stonewalling of any investigation into their businesses.
Add into account double standards applied to Dems when it comes to ethics and they can get away with almost anything compared to the other side.
2007-04-30 21:37:15 · answer #4 · answered by nosf37 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Almost as bad a waste of taxpayer money as the occupation of Iraq has been.
2007-04-30 21:31:26 · answer #5 · answered by dharma_bum48326 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It was a witch hunt pursued by the Republicans at the expense of the American people. That seems to be all Republicans are good for, spending the Peoples money on idiocy.
2007-04-30 21:30:50 · answer #6 · answered by wisdomforfools 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think the former Governor of Arkansas, Jim Guy Tucker, would be quite surprised to learn there were no indictments, since he went to jail in 1996.
2007-04-30 21:33:24 · answer #7 · answered by open4one 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It was about the right wing, still being mad about the 1960's
peace movement They couldn't get over that we left Vietnam before the job was done. Where have I heard that before. Most of the right wing, bush, newt, chency, rush, didn't serve but wanted others to die for their believes
2007-04-30 21:30:10 · answer #8 · answered by jean 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Pseudo is NOT the right word to describe that event. It did happen and maybe all the answers died with all the Clinton's friends mysterious deaths!
2007-04-30 21:30:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
This sounds like another tactic to get attention off CURRENT DANGEROUS AGENDA.
2007-04-30 21:29:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋