English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

people think it wasn't but how come one of the buildings collapsed when it wasn't even hit Bush just made it look like terrorists did so they could gain support for attacking iraq i did a lot of research but jet fuel doesn't burn at a higher temperature to burn a building

2007-04-30 14:01:21 · 12 answers · asked by jonnyraincloud 2 in News & Events Current Events

you can't believe everything you are told bush controls the media so even if bin laden did praise the attack its impossible to know unless you ask him

2007-04-30 14:24:04 · update #1

12 answers

We're all just wondering how long it will take for the truth to come out.

2007-04-30 14:16:44 · answer #1 · answered by nora22000 7 · 0 4

Jet fuel does not burn at a temperature high enough to melt steel, yet it doesn't have to in order to destroy a building. All it has to do is increase the temperature of it enough to cause it to become weak. Any metal I know of becomes softer as you increase its temperature. Also, when a building collapses it essentially releases a shock wave because of the rapidly escaping air. That combined with falling debris could have caused the other building to fall. Also, if Bush had ordered the towers destroyed then why would Osama bin Laden praise the attack after it knowing that American forces would soon be demolishing his training centers?

2007-04-30 14:16:13 · answer #2 · answered by Dan the Man 2 · 2 1

WTC 7 had hole that stretched 8~10 stories. From debris during WTC collapse. They have photos too. Yea I did lot of 'research' too and people say it can.

Remember that initial crash knocked out insulations around metal supports. These were very light insulations meant to conserve weight. Skyscrappers are all about conserving weight and materials or it won't stand 100 stories high.

It was not just fire, it was jet plane crash and fire. Skyscrappers are like empty box compare to 5 story building that can have heavy reinforced concrete walls. That's why plane didn't penetrate Pentagon. 100 story building and 5 story building are completely different.

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

Now, people who designed these building agreed to official explanation and know why it collapsed(not demolitions). I think they'll be the first to come out and say something if they see something odd. After all it is their reputation.

And it is ridiculous claim to say Bush control media. They know how to use media by leaking specific information into media, but they don't have 'control' over it like China does.

If Bush really control media and bombed WTC why would he allow millions of websites accusing him of planning 9/11?


Here's an idea. Go to China try searching gov criticisms in their internet cafe. See how long it takes before their public security bureau come snatch you away.

2007-05-01 19:55:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You don't have to melt steel to create the collapse, you just have to have enough heat to weaken the frame and let gravity take over. Building 7 was on the same foundation as the other two towers and must have experienced tremors like a major earthquake.

2007-04-30 15:53:48 · answer #4 · answered by Wait a Minute 4 · 3 0

I've read the conspiracy theories. The answer has to be the simplest one: the terror attacks were engineered by a foreign terrorist group. Even assuming that the US gov't is corrupt, it's unfathomable that they would sacrifice something of this magnitude to gain support for a war in order to control the oil trade.

2007-04-30 18:21:03 · answer #5 · answered by scorpianne 3 · 0 1

Here a question to all you left wing nut's?? If you hate it here and believe the U.S. is evil than leave!! see how life is in Iran, Syria, Afgan, North Korea, or any place in the middle east were these scum live because you say there not bad people, and we attacked and killed ourselves in 9-11 or 96 in Khobar Towers or 98 Embassy Bombings in Africa or 2000 U.S.S. Cole, leave GO THERE, LIVE AND SEE IF YOU HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS??? you say there not evil and the U.S. is. Again go live there, and tell how that works out for you, I will bet you come back with your tale between your legs

2007-04-30 17:08:09 · answer #6 · answered by dez604 5 · 2 1

And those poor people in San Fransisco now have to live with a lie and the conspiracy of how fire melted a bridge overpass with only gas from a tanker truck. Where Is Rosie when you need her?

2007-04-30 16:09:46 · answer #7 · answered by tom 4 · 1 0

Here's an idea! Why don't you just go wherever Bin Laden is and kiss his butt up close instead of taking up for that camel jockey here????


I am sure that the President wishes now that he would have consulted with YOU, seeing as to how you are all big into the whole "research" thing. I bet he coulda used YOUR expertise!!

2007-04-30 17:23:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yes it was a conspiracy, and the destruction of the bridge in SF is another example; it had to have been done by explosives, and the tanker truck catching fire was to divert attention from the demolition. Most likely Bush will blame it on stealth aircraft.

2007-04-30 16:03:37 · answer #9 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 0 2

I don't know if it was a government conspiracy, but there is no way the planes took down those buildings. They had steel frames, built to withstand the force of being hit by an airplane. It was imploded.

2007-04-30 14:08:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

i doubt it, but i think bush actually got a report warning about an attack and did nothing about it.

2007-04-30 16:24:10 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers