The main reason is that almost everything you Bush Bashers criticize President Bush for has its roots in the clinton presidency. Clinton refused to capture Osama on several occasions... 9/11 was ONE of the results of this brilliant foreign policy moves. Clinton's genius again was displayed in placating North Korea with the sweetest deal they ever saw, now you left wingers are critical of the Bush administration for having to deal with that mess. You liberal sheep holler every day about Bush telling lies about the reasons for the Iraq war. All the while you KNOW that the entire world of intelligence agencies, US and all those of the free world had determined that Saddam had WMDs and was killing off his own citizens by the thousands. It was CLINTON that first made the WMD argument!! In numerous public addresses, but no, you conveniently ignore that little gem. So let us assume that WMDs never did exist, despite the fact they were used on the Kurds numerous times, and that Clinton never said what he did say about them. Bush acted on the best available intelligence that he had. Interestingly, that advice came directly from the CIA, headed by Clinton's hand picked boy...GEORGE TENNANT. Live in your deluded world, but don't try to escape facts.
2007-04-30 13:36:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Charles V 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Maybe it is because the question about George Bush was really about the same thing Bill Clinton already did and got away with. Why is it okay for one political party to violate an oath, take advantage of a situation, and violate peoples rights but not for the other political party to do so?
President Bill Clinton violated a young lady working at the white house and therefore abused his power of office. The people of the U.S. voted to impeach him, but even tho he was impeached he stayed in office and violated his position even more.
Democrat or Republican makes very little difference. They all believe in taxing the people. They all want to take away your rights, and take advantage of anybody they can. I think all politicans are liars. After all it was the Clinton Administration that gave us the false info that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, and it was George Bush who acted on it. So both parties are to blame for us being in Iraq... It don't take no rocket scientist to see that both political parties lie for their own good.
Samantha
2007-04-30 19:45:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I by no skill observed Bush attempt to restrict gay marriage, he did no longer have self assurance in it yet neither does Obama. The Patriot act enabled distinctive branches of the government to interchange information approximately terrorists, something smart once you're combating a conflict. Up till Bush I heard particularly some Democrats tell me that Saddam became right into achievable to the peace and protection of the area. additionally that he funded and experienced terrorists. I by no skill heard Bush show a want to attack the two North Korea or Iran, he know that they weren't acquaintances of ours. I by no skill heard Bush say something approximately minorities in Louisiana or everywhere else. Clinton by no skill worked an afternoon in his existence, respected no person and became right into a coward. Bush became right into a greater proper guy via a techniques.
2016-10-14 05:20:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why Can't Left Wing Democrats answer Questions about the Clinton's without bringing up the Bush's?
are they brain dead or jealous that bush actually accomplished something other than a crime(whitewater) and adultery? Also i believe they are upset because the Bush's have no intentions of robbing the white house before they leave....
maybe if Hillary gets voted in...... She will return what she stole :)
2007-04-30 13:24:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tr!sh 1
·
4⤊
2⤋
Why can't left-wing Democrats ask a question about Republican politics without bring up George Bush? See how dumb you sound.
2007-05-01 10:35:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Big D 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not everyone does so. There are many very conservative Republicans who are horrified at GWB and the Bush League, and they tend to regard Bill Clinton as irrelevant.
Those who do act as described demonstrate a frightening corruption of social conscience.
Everybody is responsible for their own actions. Clinton did some things wrong, and Clinton is answerable for them. Bush did some things wrong, and Bush is answerable for them. Both conservatives and liberals agree on that.
Then there are those who call themselves "conservative" AND those who call themselves "liberal" whose most frequent response to any criticism is the childish defense of "HE did it FIRST!" or "He did worse!" -- or just stick their fingers in their ears and chant "nyah! nyah! nyah!"
It is only a zealot who can see no wrong in his own side and no good in the opposition, and zealots are a minority. A pox on all their houses. They do not represent the majority, and we should stop letting them pretend to.
2007-04-30 17:01:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by AnitraWeb 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Could be you are in attack mode when you call people brain dead. We all know both sides have attack doggy's and it is getting real mean. This all helps to divide America so we can hate everyone including ourselves. So, what is you question?
There is nothing to be jealous about from either party unless failures on both side is something to be jealous of.
If the purpose of this question is to slam and attack, you've done it. Now if you have a question, ask it or get a life.
2007-04-30 13:18:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ret. Sgt. 7
·
5⤊
3⤋
Because they are playing a "game" The game is " Us vs. Them" Its not about truth, freedom, right, wrong, justice, peace, or anything else. Its about winning for their side at all costs! They bring up Bill Clinton as a diversion.
Remember these people are "service to self" individuals.
2007-04-30 13:20:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Hathor 4
·
2⤊
4⤋
As we all know by now...it's all Clinton's fault and will continue to be his fault for the next two hundred years.
2007-04-30 13:20:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
As President Bush's predecessor, President Clinton's decisions during the 1990's greatly impact the decisions that have been made during the few years of the new century.
2007-04-30 13:16:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by gayconservativ 3
·
7⤊
4⤋