English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Mine is salems lot and It

2007-04-30 11:21:39 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Books & Authors

10 answers

Stephen King ;-)

Insomnia, The Stand, and The Talisman (co-authored w Peter Straub)

Love King, although lately his books have bored me. sigh.

2007-04-30 11:26:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Salem's Lot is a favorite of mine because it was one of the first King books I read, and it was vampire book. I had windows at the time that looked similar to the ones in the old movie, and while reading the BOOK, I had to stop reading by 9 at night, otherwise I would have nightmares which involved my bedroom windows. . . It was probably just my imagination.

However, The Stand and the Dark Tower series are the best.

2007-04-30 20:20:34 · answer #2 · answered by Piaz 5 · 0 0

Salem's Lot and The Shining

2007-04-30 18:27:26 · answer #3 · answered by smallnoggin 2 · 0 0

I have enjoyed many of Stephen King's books, but my favorites are his 7-Book Series called The Dark Tower series. The first book is called The Gunslinger, and progress to the last book which is called The Dark Tower. He says it is his magnum opus work, and many of the characters from his other major books cross in and out of the story. You might say it's the spine of many of the worlds he has created in his books. They are not terribly gory...it's just an amazing and compelling adventure story.

2007-04-30 18:31:49 · answer #4 · answered by SillySally 2 · 1 0

Salem's Lot. I had to sleep with the light on all the way through it.

2007-04-30 19:01:19 · answer #5 · answered by margot 5 · 0 0

Salem's lot is good one, pet cemetery, green mile and the stand are a few of mine

2007-04-30 18:40:41 · answer #6 · answered by sandman 2 · 0 0

I loved The Talisman...so detailed and creepy. He is such a great writer. His son also started writing and I've heard great reviews on his new book. I guess he writes a lot like his dad. My fiance loved Pet Semetery...we're both huge fans

2007-04-30 18:27:46 · answer #7 · answered by Cara and Dave 3 · 0 0

It and The Stand. Neither movie does the book justice.

2007-04-30 18:27:31 · answer #8 · answered by vnlathndr775 4 · 0 0

i haven't read any of his books, but i love that movie the stand. i watched it for the first time, then a crow flew by my house. lol, i was like, maybe the devil wants to recruit me!

2007-04-30 18:27:30 · answer #9 · answered by Lauren* 1 · 0 1

The Stand - no contest. It's far and away his best.

"In 1978, science fiction writer Spider Robinson wrote a scathing review of The Stand in which he exhorted his readers to grab strangers in bookstores and beg them not to buy it.
The Stand is like that. You either love it or hate it, but you can't ignore it. Stephen King's most popular book, according to polls of his fans, is an end-of-the-world scenario: a rapidly mutating flu virus is accidentally released from a U.S. military facility and wipes out 99 and 44/100 percent of the world's population, thus setting the stage for an apocalyptic confrontation between Good and Evil.

"I love to burn things up," King says. "It's the werewolf in me, I guess.... The Stand was particularly fulfilling, because there I got a chance to scrub the whole human race, and man, it was fun! ... Much of the compulsive, driven feeling I had while I worked on The Stand came from the vicarious thrill of imagining an entire entrenched social order destroyed in one stroke."

There is much to admire in The Stand: the vivid thumbnail sketches with which King populates a whole landscape with dozens of believable characters; the deep sense of nostalgia for things left behind; the way it subverts our sense of reality by showing us a world we find familiar, then flipping it over to reveal the darkness underneath. Anyone who wants to know, or claims to know, the heart of the American experience needs to read this book."

"A brilliant novel!, September 20, 2002
Reviewer:J. N. Mohlman (Barrington, RI USA) - See all my reviews

Before I get to the meat of my review, I feel I should provide a little bit of perspective. First, I am not a die-hard Stephen King fan. In fact, aside from "The Stand", I have only read collections of his short stories, so I can assure you my review isn't the rabid defense of an overly loyal admirer. Second, I am not a fan of horror and I wouldn't classify "The Stand" as such. Finally, I am a big fan of the "apocalyptic fiction" genre, and I believe I have a pretty good basis for my evaluation of this novel.
That said, "The Stand" is an incredible novel; perhaps one of the best I have ever read, by any author or in any genre. The story is predicated on the accidental release of a "super-flu" that wipes out 99% of the humans on the planet. The survivors find themselves drawn into a battle between good and evil that will determine the future of the entire planet.

As one might expect, a novel with such an ambitious plot and of such prodigious length touches upon numerous themes. In order to simplify my review, I am going to break down the novel's strengths into the following categories, and then consider them one at a time: world-building, plot, characters and themes.

First is world-building. In most apocalyptic fiction, one (if not both) of two things will be true: 1. The characters stay in one place or 2. The action picks up after the disaster. An example of the first is "Earth Abides" and of the latter "On the Beach". There's nothing wrong with either plot device, but in "The Stand" King injects a remarkable level of detail into his novel by covering the super-flu from start to finish. The novel starts at the very beginning of the outbreak, and many key plot lines are developed before the epidemic ever rears its head. King charts the breakdown and eventual destruction of civilization, and then offers a short, but remarkable, picture of the survivors in the immediate days after the flu has run its course. He makes the subtle observation that many survivors would die in a second wave of suicides, accidents and depression that would weed out many of those unequipped for an empty world. Finally, as the story progresses, King makes remarkable (but not overbearing) predictions about how nature would reshape the U.S. in the absence of man.

Second to consider is the plot. As I alluded to earlier, King has used the emptied United States as a battleground between good and evil. Soon after the flu has run its course, the survivors begin having dreams about an old woman (Mother Abigail) who seems to be marshalling the forces of good, and a malign presence (Randall Flagg) who is gathering those who would serve him and his ends. Insofar as the reader knows, the choice is clear-cut, irrevocable and mandatory. It is very much a "are you with us or against us" type of situation. That said, much of the book is devoted to the characters traveling across country to Boulder or Las Vegas (guess which side is where), no mean feat in a world without mass transit, hotels, etc. In fact, King's writing is so effective, the novel would be fascinating if the characters did nothing but travel around and attempt to reestablish society. The second, metaphysical, layer just makes it all the more interesting.

Thirdly, we have the characters to consider; I'll won't name names or speak in specifics to avoid ruining the plot, but there are a few general points worth mentioning. To start, the cast of characters in "The Stand" rivals that of "Lord of the Rings", and King handles it every bit as well as Tolkien. One might expect that a novel with a story this complex would skimp on character development, but the opposite is actually true. King took a huge idea (good vs. evil) and reduced it to a human element that the reader could digest. His characters show an incredible range of emotion, and even their flaws serve to enhance the reader's view of them. They struggle and fail and are rarely sure of themselves, in other words, they are human. As such, their actions take on a level of realism that is astonishing.

Finally, we come to the themes of the book. The way I see it there are three: the dualistic nature of good and evil, redemption and hope. The first is the most obvious, King correctly points out that good cannot be appreciated or striven for in the absence of bad. We can strive to limit the effects of evil, but it will never be overcome, as King sees greed and hate as intrinsic to the human condition in general, and civilization specifically. The second theme, of redemption, is subtler and offsets the first. King does not paint anyone is irretrievably lost, and along the same lines, he considers how good intentions are frequently misdirected through ignorance and fear. King seems to believe that given the opportunity and support, anyone can salvage their lives. Which brings us to the final theme of hope. As the novel ends, the reader knows that evil has not been vanquished, but also that it can never triumph because within its very nature are the seeds of its destruction. Over time, evil empires have gained power because they have torn down their enemies (see Nazi Germany), but as the saying goes, live by the sword, die by the sword. There is always hope, because evil cannot win.

There are so many other points to touch on, I could write indefinitely, but what it all comes down to is this: if you're looking for a novel that will entertain you even as it makes you think, "The Stand" is for you."

For more reviews, go to the link below, please.

2007-04-30 18:29:34 · answer #10 · answered by johnslat 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers