Wow, what a grt question!
There is a clash! But both don't lose their inherent properties because of the clash.
2007-04-30 11:39:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Perhaps when the irresistible force meets the immovable object, it is not the object but the rest of the universe that moves.
Peace.
2007-04-30 18:32:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Doctor Why 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
This is about infinity, theres no such thing as an immovable object likewise an irresistable force. Somethings gotta give, even when suns collide something gives.
But then CERN collides atoms at great speed to release energy, so I guess if you get close to immovable/irresistable you would get an energy release.
2007-04-30 18:23:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by John S 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Alot of nothing. If it is irresistible, then it cannot be resisted, thus it is attracted or has no affect on it. The immovable object if it is truly immovable will by definition not move.
2007-04-30 18:28:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jimbo W 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would be impossible. There are no irresistible forces and there are no immovable objects.
2007-04-30 18:23:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Rocky Balboa
2007-04-30 18:26:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ken S 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
E=MC^2 They exchange places but this time the energy is headed away from the object.
2007-04-30 18:58:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sophist 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's called a singularity.
The only real singularities that I know of are black holes. They fizzle out, ultimately, because of Hawking radiation (after Stephen Hawking, who figured out how it worked).
so that's the answer. Whatever happens is dramatic, impossible to measure, indeterminite, but ultimately boring.
2007-04-30 18:28:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by wild_eep 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Stasis.
2007-05-01 07:42:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by los 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
expurgation and a painting of equl lines,the Beckett plot and modern novel
2007-04-30 22:25:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋