yep, he leads off next inning with a fresh count.
2007-04-30 10:02:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by madcaplaughs30 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. In effect, the at-bat is treated as if it never happened. The same batter leads off the next inning with a brand new count.
2007-04-30 10:57:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by frenchy62 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. His plate appearance was never completed. If he doesn't lead off the next inning (unless he is pinch-hit for), the team is batting out of order.
MLB Rule 6.04:
A batter has legally completed his time at bat when he is put out or becomes a runner.
Since neither has happened, he leads off the next inning with a new count.
2007-04-30 10:18:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chipmaker Authentic 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If a runner is thrown out stealing, the batter at the time leads off the following inning. The batter's appearance at the plate in the completed inning is not an at-bat, but the one in the next inning will be.
2016-05-17 11:40:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, that batter will lead off the next inning.
2007-04-30 10:50:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. He leads off the next inning.
2007-04-30 10:28:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes because technically the at-bat was never finished
so the batter gets a whole new at-bat
2007-04-30 10:43:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Nets 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, definitely! He starts out the next inning with a fresh count. always. I've had to remind my coach of this a number of times.
Baseball Rocks!!!!
2007-04-30 10:04:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by blondey08 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes,if his at bat was not completed he leads off the next inning.
2007-04-30 10:48:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES with a new count 0-0
2007-04-30 10:56:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by sportsguy1134 1
·
0⤊
0⤋