Anarchy to work requires that everybody is so in control of themselves that no laws are required to protect anyone. Is the ultimate self-control and righteousness.
Most people I know tend to describe "heaven" as anarchy.
2007-04-30 10:17:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jose R 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
anarchy is another form of order. there is always a leader to lead the anarchists and strength in numbers. truth is no system will ever fully work. there will always be people who corrupt any good system for thier own personal gains and if anarchy over threw the government they would then be the new government so what would be the point. a balance of power versus anarchy should be maintained. if either one rises above we'd have a dictatorship.
2007-04-30 09:16:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by mongoose29 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Anarchists are stupid immature punks.
They think they would have more freedom if there were no government at all, no laws, or anything. But any rational, intelligent person would know that you would have absolutely no freedom in an anarchy. I mean...how much freedom do you think the average Iraqi has in the middle of Baghdad? Now also remember that even there they have some police and some laws that some people abide by. Imagine NO laws and NO police.
2007-04-30 09:13:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
To me, it just means decentralized democracy.
Most importantly, what it means is that if the employees of a company decide they want to run the company democratically, then they should have the right to stop listening to the owners of the company, collect all the profits and redistribute as they choose among themselves. It is a different form of civil disobedience. Instead of stopping work and going on strike, they continue work, except they stop listening to the CEO and board of directors.
This has been happening in a limited extent in Argentina, where employees have been taking over companies that were set to be closed down by the owners. Also, in Brazil, the Landless Peasants Movement has been occupying unused land, and using it to grow food.
2007-05-01 06:11:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by cyu 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I was going to organize a protest march in favor of anarchy, but nobody showed up.
2016-05-17 11:12:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by zoraida 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anarchy would lead to the country being ruled by the strongest Criminal Gang.
Because they are the only ones who are: Armed,Organised, and who would take no notice of Law or Absence of Law.
2007-04-30 13:38:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Vincent A 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm as sympathetic to the ideal of anarchism as a sane person can be, but it's a philosophy that is completely out of touch with human nature. You can't have a society more complex than a basic sort of clan structure (not even tribal), withough some sort of 'archy' other than 'an'-'archy.' Large groups of human beings are just incompatible with total individual freedom. Sorry.
2007-04-30 09:29:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by B.Kevorkian 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
one thing to rememeebr too the shooting of the arch duke that started WWI was done by a group of Serbian persons who belived in Anarchy. Those few shots led to hundreds of thousands of deaths
2007-04-30 09:19:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by lethander_99 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
anarchy means to me the need to break down the current government....to get rid of congress and the senantors....to wind the world down to an extinction of homo-sapiens
2007-04-30 09:11:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think anarchest need to get organized! LOL
But really if there was ever a time to pissed at the state it has to be in the times we live in now.
Have fun kids!
2007-04-30 09:14:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by onesinnergirl 2
·
0⤊
1⤋