Are pro-choicers also against mandatory seat-belt laws?

Question

just another choice to think about.

Its about choice over ones body....right?

Answer 1

Sway you really brought out the pathetic left wing wack jobs on this one. Its sickening to read some of the selfish answers, and the insane ones about insurance that makes it obvious they have no clue as to what your asking. The "my body my choice" line is total bull and is just as wrong and sickening, but thats the point of your question. The pro-choice baby killers want to have that option at their disposal. They could care less about the baby, its all about them and their selfish needs. But, ironically, when it comes to basically the same thing regarding their own lives they care just as less about themselves as they do about the unborn child. So yes, it seems they have issues with unserstanding the difference between an actual right and a desire, and they also have issues with any type of authority or controlling figures in regards to human lives. Therefore one must conclude, that they have no regard for human life irregardless. .

Answer 2

This is a silly, yet typical, question. It tries to equate two things that are not the same to make a point that cannot be made by sticking to the facts.

Seat belt laws are in place because the state has an interest in the health and lives of its citizens, so it is free to create laws to protect said health and lives. The choice of having an abortion does not risk the lives of any citizens, and making it illegal can actually have a negative effect on the health of citizens.

A better question to ask, as the two sides actually do relate to each other, would be if anti-choice crusaders adopt a lot of unwanted children.

Answer 3

Okay--now that I've wiped the diet coke off my monitor, I will say GOOD Q SWAY!!!

The answer of course is that IT IS THEIR BODY THEIR CHOICE (don't know wht cows have to do with this). If someone tells them they need to wear a seat belt--DAMN THEM! They won't just for spite. Kinda how some pro-choicers feel about preventative BC, don't you think?

ROTFL-Libs are out in full force. Now abortion is an insurance rate issue!

Answer 4

I'm a such a Libertarian that I'm against seat-belt laws. I think is part of a nanny state and not a democratic society, you're right is one more choice to think about. Is my body and if I want to wear a seat belt is my choice. I know other Libertarians that feel the same way. I'm Pro-choice.

Answer 5

I think seatbelt laws are similar to helmet laws. There shouldn't be a need for a law. It's a person's right to choose if they want to go through a windshield in a car accident, or crack his skull open on the pavement in a motorcycle accident. Honestly, let people decide for themselves. There's enough educational films and programs out there that no one should have the excuse, "I didn't know I'd spill half my brain on the street without a helmet!"

As far as pro-choice...it needs to be regulated. No late-term abortions, but who is to define "late-term"?

Answer 6

valuable...... they surpassed the regulation because of the fact it saves lives. Say somebody rear ends you. You hit your head on the steerage wheel and lose administration subsequently the twist of destiny is worse. or basically somebody hits you the place ever. you would be jarred and lose administration of the motor vehicle. or you basically might desire to end too quickly. element is that in case you're strapped in you will preserve extra administration of the motor vehicle. someone might then have the means to avert an twist of destiny all at the same time. Or have the means to decrease the wear and not have much extra autos in contact in a crash. So this is not any longer basically a query of government involvement in an persons precise to choose for. it incredibly is for anybody'S secure practices. i'm able to assest to this. i became as quickly as hit by using somebody. My automobile became swerving into oncoming site visitors. yet I had administration adequate to you are able to steer right into a swerve and ended up on the realm with out hitting all and sundry else. I did roll the motor vehicle thrice regardless of the undeniable fact that. The paramedics pried me out and expressed amazement that i became nonetheless alive. i became banged up yet became nonetheless walking and talking. Random ideas on your essay....... look up rules approximately cellular telephone utilization and using with turn flops. look up "graduated licenses" for toddlers. this is going to coach you statistics which will lead you to why they have all of those rules.

Answer 7

Why should they? They have a choice of protecting their own bodies inside their own cars! Anyway, you can also expect these pro-choice folks to use seat belts when they drive around in nations without seat-belt laws.

And please, never expect that banning abortion in the US does stop anyone, with means, not to travel abroad for abortions if they really are determined to have it. Banning abortion here in the US is only one way to tell poor women in America that their bodies are under the control of the US. government and US courts... nothing more!

Answer 8

We do not need to be told how to live. However things such as insurance and taxes punish us for the actions of others. I always buckle and speed. I was in a situation that made abortion the best solution. Individuals rights end where others begin. So you draw the line.

Answer 9

I don't get the connection. I would be curious to read what yours is.

Well, your connection is tenuous at best. Just let me say that a women's right to choose isn't responsible for thousands of deaths a year. Not wearing a seat belt is.

Answer 10

No, it isn't "just another choice" actually.
Having an abortion may, in fact, decrease the insurance rates of "others" - while not wearing a seat belt is proven to increase the insurance costs of "others".

Two different things entirely. Limp arguments beating a dead horse don't even shoo away flies.