I believe that his administration setup explosive charges to bring the bridge down similar to the Twin Towers because we all "know" that burning fuel is not hot enough to melt steel...
2007-04-30 08:08:35 · 25 answers · asked by Eric R 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
As some of you no doubt have figured out... This was a sarcastic slam to all the 9/11 conspiracy theorists.
2007-04-30 08:26:32 · update #1
Some great answers so far everyone. Just a few "too serious" ones.
2007-04-30 08:37:25 · update #2
Are you really Rosie O'Donnell?
2007-04-30 08:13:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
The only people I have seen talking about Bush blowing up the bridge are those scared to death that conspiracy theorists or liberals may blame Bush. Are these people paranoid or what?
Typical, they are the same ones that obsessed for days about some comment by a movie celebrity regarding toilet paper.
Important issues are things they don't talk about because they know they will lose if they do so they make accusations and stupid statements just to divert conversation from the truth and real issues of the day.
2007-04-30 15:28:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ah, the engineers in here. Wait, it could be the Jews! yeah!, they did it. I wonder how many Jews were driving and decided to pull over as the tanker drove by. I wonder if the driver was Jewish, hmmm!? cold it be the force of the explosion was strong enough, besides we are talking about a CA bridge.
2007-04-30 15:38:33 · answer #3 · answered by realrepublican 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I do believe Bush has other things to worry about than taking down bridges right now.
2007-04-30 15:15:07 · answer #4 · answered by Cookie 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I can't blame Bush for everything, but i can for some things. Freeway overpasses collapse, this is nothing new. Now buildings collapsing from fire, thats never happened before, till 9/11.
2007-04-30 15:22:44 · answer #5 · answered by jeb black 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, that without a doubt is a very sick question Hey, I know, let's pick on someone else and see what happens to their ratings.
Hey, I know, Clinton.
2007-04-30 15:14:28 · answer #6 · answered by makeitright 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Haha I knew that would be on here as soon as I saw it on the news last night.. Honestly, that's the first thing I thought! But seriously, come on.
2007-04-30 15:16:56 · answer #7 · answered by Frank 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, if he had an energy policy that weaned us off the oil tit, maybe that tanker wouldn't have been there at precisely that time, thus, no accident....
2007-04-30 15:16:59 · answer #8 · answered by conx-the-dots 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Google "Loose Change 2" and watch.
2007-04-30 15:31:32 · answer #9 · answered by gizmo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yesterday someone asked if the libs were going to blame Bush. I told them to just wait, it was coming. You proved me right!
2007-04-30 15:17:18 · answer #10 · answered by JessicaRabbit 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The fuel burning didn't destroy the bridge but the massive explosion did.
2007-04-30 15:13:18 · answer #11 · answered by the_end_of_the_cons 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋