Once it's able to turn q profit, it will be commercialized.
2007-04-30 04:04:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Gene 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
NASA and others already get paid to put sattilites up there. But if you are asking if private businesses should get in the game, I say yes.
Some will ask what is there up there to see, it's a billionares plaything, etc. But Columbus had to get backing from the spainish royality and was looking for spices for the rich. Today we have the US, Canada, Mexico and so on.
There is no way we should not continue to explore and commercialize space. It is in it's infancy and only the rich get the 5 minute ride. But what will it be in 50 years or a 100? Those with real imagination see the possiblities.
2007-04-30 04:18:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by David C 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, for several reasons.
1. The natural resources lying about in our solar system are worth several hundreds of times more than all the oil, gas, gold, platinum, silver etc that has ever been, or will be, found on earth. This alone makes the commercialisation and industrialisation of space worth every penny.
2. The earth is too small! The human race needs to expand and spread ourselves out to ensure survival!
3. Space inspires - well, at least I certainly find it inspiring. The cooperation required to commercialise space could have some real scientific, cultural, and economic benefits for the whole world, as long as it's correctly managed!
2007-04-30 04:54:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I definately think it should be commercialized. If it becomes profitable, then other companies may say Hey, we can do that too, with better views, longer runs and so forth. The point of that exposure is that it can (not will) boost the market, industry, private sectors and investors into funding better R&D for spacecraft and propulsion. There really are only a few good ideas that are being worked on.. antimatter NOT being one of them.. The fusion engine being one of the top models. With an si of better than 200+ times that of our current Shuttles primary engines, a fusion rocket can get us up and down quickly and smoothly, as well as to the moon and back in a quick trip. Im not going to say that the fusion rocket model looks efficient, and I dont suspect that its first test run will be, but it has great potential to be cheap propulsion.
Hopefully that market will continue to develop. The faster we research viable and cost-effective aerospace hulls and systems, the faster we will get out into space.
With the need for more and better concentrated minerals and materials for our planets, a push to the space market will help us get out to resources like the asteriod belts and catching comets for bare essentials like water, gold, copper, tin, iron. Hopefully, with transatmospheric vehicles, we could finally build a moon base, or mars base, or a working space station, and take some heavy industries and manufacturing off-planet for a change.
Regular flights into space can also be used to jettison condensed C02 into space and out of our atmosphere. Another way to stop gigatons of c02 from building up.
And Steve below me is a genious, pointing out WHY we need to get to places like the belt.
2007-04-30 04:45:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by sbravosystems 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is commercialised. NASA, the Russians and ESA did not put all those satellites up there for free.
Voyages of discovery have almost always been sponsored by states and governments. Private commercial trade and services have always followed. Why should space be any different? It's just that currently the $$$ are a lot bigger.
2007-04-30 04:06:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Simon T 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it shouldn't be commercialized. The money that they will use for that could be used for a better cause. Going in space for just 5 minutes is too much of a luxury and is very impractical.
2007-04-30 04:44:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jeyp 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Should be, can be, and is being commercialized now. But there will also be a place for government space for many years to come.
2007-04-30 06:32:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I personally don't want to do it because there could be a chance of you getting killed in space. What is there's no more oxygen? What if the spaceship suddenly blows up like other times before? So many little things that could risk your life. My answer is NO!!
2007-04-30 10:21:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by lildigipoke 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
we've been exploring area ever on condition that we despatched out the first probes and satellites. we've already had human beings on the moon. we've human beings residing in area immediately. even as isn't the question. in case you mean even as human beings will be waiting for deep exploration through human navigation, nicely that in simple terms relies upon on after we come across a swifter thanks to shipping ourselves from Earth to the end of this galaxy without it taking many years, yet extremely days or perhaps hours.
2016-11-23 17:03:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It has already in small ways if you are a billionaire Russia are willing to send you to space
2007-04-30 04:07:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by ANNETTE D 2
·
0⤊
0⤋