What is MARRIAGE for?

Question

If more than a half of marriages in US end up with divorces why did they married then. How can someone stop his/her sexual desire and "commit" his/herself to only one partner along his/her lifetime, could they survive this kind of relationship. However there is no monogamy animal, especially Homo Sapiens, sex is great

Answer 1

Sadly, everything that you are saying is true. Marriage used to be a sacred institution and when people said, "Til death do us part" they meant it. Now it seems more like: " til I get tired of you, til something better comes along, til the sex gets bad, til you run out of money, til you gain weight, til the kids get here". The list goes on and on. Marriage doesn't seem to mean much to anyone any more.

Answer 2

If you feel that you can't be monogomous, then you should not consider marriage. Sexual desire can be fulfilled with one partner if there is a real connection, friendship, and true love and respect from both partners. No marriage is without it's hurdles, but commitment means just that. Stick it out through the good and bad times. It seems that this generation is much more selfish; always seeking self gratification and living for today, not thinking of tomorrow. Not thinking of how their actions affect those around them like their families and children. How can someone make a commitment to finish school, college, and pursue a lifelong career if they can't "commit" to any one thing? If a person is young and wants to live their life without commitment to one person, then please at least be honest enough to let the people you are sexually active with know so that they are not assuming that a relationship could develop into something monogomous and be responsible enough to practice safe sex so that no ones health is jeapordized and no children are conceived. Marriage is awesome when a man and a woman love each other enough to grow old together. I know, because I will be celebrating my 25th anniversary next year and yes the sex is great!

Answer 3

Marriage is not for everyone. I'll tell you what, though. Your statement about half of marriages end in divorce- you are right. Do you know why? No one wants to work out problems. They don't want to give it a try. That's how we are now a days and it's sad. If you love someone enough, and respect someone enough, that is the only person you would want to sleep with. But, as I said, marriage isn't for everyone, and those of you who don't believe in it, or want to get married aren't horrible people. Maybe if people stopped thinking that marriage would be the salvation of a crappy relationship and then not want to work to build a great relationship- are the reason why marriage doesn't last...

Answer 4

Just remember that every time you make out or have sex with a person, you are doing so with all the others they have been with and similarly they are making out and having sex with every one you have been with!

As you can see the trains can get very long in a hurry and a big time wreck is inevitable.

Deep rooted commitment is a great thing, it makes one get away from the superficial. As stated above some are not suited as they are only able to look for and portray the superficial.

Go on a vacation alone and meditate about this and you will see that the superficial life style just doesn't satisfy the soul.

Answer 5

I think if you aren't serious about your vows and willing to work at a marriage with one person, curb your desires and wanton behavior then no marriage is going to last. Just in case no one has said this already, marriage is a lot of work, it a full time commitment to keep it on the right path, and that is where a lot of us screw up, we take advantage of what we have, we assume it will always be there and be good. Oh how wrong we are. Sex is great, but sex with your partner is better, no worries about disease, no wondering if they are enjoying themselves, its not random, its not lust driven its love driven which in my opinion is the best sx.

Answer 6

I remember stories my Grandfather and how he didn't treat my Grandmother very well (he died before I was born).

But she was raised to strictly stick by her husband and no matter what kind of crap he pulled she was unwaivering.

I'm not saying this is right or wrong, but the attitude for marriage used to be like this. If you ever listen to the classic marriage vows it virtually lectures the woman to be subserviant to the man until one of them died.

The "rule of thumb" meant it was not legal to punish your wife with anything wider than your thumb. Some women were treated quite poorly by their partners but suffered in silence, never rocking the boat and this was accepted by society.

You can see how this would create a lot less conflict than today when both sexes in a partnership can be locked in conflict when neither one wants to back down. The natural result of continued conflicts is a breakdown in relationships.

My wife and I are on that runaway train and have some stellar fights. Even being aware of it is doing little to slow down the derailment.

Answer 7

The reason for most marriages is because of Trust, but unfortunately trust seems to disappear in a lot of marriages. The thing is that when two people get marries that they are supposed to be with each other in the good times and the bad.

Answer 8

See, the worry with the "nicely, a brother and sister residing co-dependently might want to savor the same advantages" skill that no 2 immediately human beings have *ever* abused the marriage equipment even as they weren't in a romantic relationship. yet a sibling couple doing so might want to nonetheless be legally "married"; they would not then, in turn, be allowed to marry absolutely everyone they were really romantically fascinated in without dissolving that partnership, with all the criminal issues a divorce may reason. I recommend, i assume if a brother/sister pair (or brother/brother or sister/sister, were gay marriage criminal) wanted to enter right into a lifelong, non-romantic criminal partnership, particular, they could conceivably call for they be granted marriage rights. yet such partnerships might want to be really few and far between, as i imagine the social stigma of stressful you be allowed to marry your sister might want to probable suppress that team. A extra pertinent question might want to be on the thanks to address the variety of members in a wedding ceremony. If marriage is spread out from the position it really is now, then there is the question about no matter if polyamorous unions should be legally regarded. And if we then more advantageous marriage to allow, say, 4 contributors, then what about polygamists who sense socially ostracized because they have a 5-way relationship? Polygamists and brothers desirous to marry their sisters, besides the indisputable fact that, represent a tiny, tiny fraction of yank society. Homosexuals, even as nonetheless a minority, volume a thoughts better. starting up marriage to similar-sex couples, i believe, is a thanks to provide those romantic pairings the same criminal rights that are presently loved via similar partnerships, even as minimizing the change to the perfect equipment. particular, the "slippery slope" argument can nonetheless be utilized, yet merely because starting up marriage to homosexuals might want to open up a higher can of worms does not recommend that is not a superior and perfect element to do.

Answer 9

In case you had not noticed, all the free sex and different partners are causing a pandemic of STDs and HIV/AIDs There was a reason as to why there was to be one partner and one partner only until death. Wolves, and swans are monogamous.

Answer 10

Sometimes people are con artists to get what they want and they 'try on' a lifestyle finding out they don't like it later. Or they pretend to be another type of person to get into a relationship. I've been with a few who have misrepresented themselves.