2007-04-30 02:33:09 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
As long as the dinosaur media has a anti-Bush agenda, people like Tenant will be able to find an audience for old news
2007-04-30 02:37:35 · answer #1 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
I think this is impossible. Freedom of Speech is a right we do not want to lose. You have the choice to not purchase the book, you have the choice to not read the book and you have the choice to read it and hate it. or read it and love it. Don't give up your choices just to silence some one you don't agree with. I am a card carrying - liberal - maybe not as liberal as some and maybe more liberal than others - either way I will fight for you to have the right to tell me I am stupid for my opinions like so many do on this forum. Maybe I am but we can't silence any one else and keep our own freedom. think about that - thank you for your question and have a nice day.
2007-04-30 02:42:51 · answer #2 · answered by kbama 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
People love Ann Coulter's books...if they don't realize that those books are purely for entertainment purposes (as is Fox News channel) then I don't know what to tell you...you can't pander to the lowest common denominator ALL of the time
2007-04-30 02:46:18 · answer #3 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No .. "freedom of speech/press". Anyone who reads a book by a politician should expect to be reading a largely biased, opinionated piece of literature. If you want the truth, read the newspaper. Actuallly, nevermind. If you want to find out the truth, you have extremely high aspirations. Good luck!
2007-04-30 02:38:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 0⤋
oh, so not only do you not want to read a certain book but you want to stop others from reading it too? how compassionate and understanding you are. If there isn't someone holding a gun to your head making you read one of these books then keep your PITA attitude out of my freedoms. Or is it you yearn for the good old days of Nazi Germany, the rounding up of subversive teaching and the great pyres of knowledge destruction.
2007-04-30 02:48:16 · answer #5 · answered by Alan S 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. People don't have to buy them, others people can write books to try and refute them. This comes under Freedom of the Press, one of the most basic freedoms in the USA guaranteed by the Constitution.
2007-04-30 02:40:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It is well known now that the Bush administration handled terribly the intelligence gathered prior to entering Iraq. In a democracy, truth eventually rules.
2007-04-30 02:40:32 · answer #7 · answered by Firesidechat 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Sure, if you want to do away with the first amendment.
If you're looking for a good plan, you could read the following column: "Ten Steps to Fascism" http://harpers.org/archive/2007/04/horton-20070424asor
2007-04-30 02:46:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, that's right, take away the freedom of speech, too. Great job, keep up the good work. And you haven't seen anything yet. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Bush's legacy is toast.
2007-04-30 02:43:40 · answer #9 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I can't stand Ann Coulter either.
2007-04-30 03:56:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋