English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I would actually blame
death tyrant Bush,he's not making matters any better and his craving for oil and world domination is killing lots of humans everyday.He wants to veto a bill,a bill that would save lives,which means he forbids it and wants his looney war to continue.Blood oil is what
war ape Bush and his Dick Cheney is going to get.McCain isn't going to be any better,he's a Republican,meaning he is obviously for war.The upcoming election might just be rigged to make McCain president just like Bush's.Ninny Bush is more of a threat than any one else and he is risking the safety of his own people.All of the above is why I would blame neanderthal Bush (Satan) if the USA got wiped off the Earth.Who would you blame?

2007-04-30 01:42:36 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Bob S and Bush_is_Hitler's *******,
you've made some interesting and great points.Also,about the threats against Democrats,that just shows how immoral and screwed up you Republicans really are.War is evil,so don't support it.
Keep it up,Democrats. :)

2007-05-02 02:28:15 · update #1

10 answers

Tho your question is a bit scattered in its asking, and it shows your views very well, I would blame our current 'president' here are the reasons:
1. By our very presence in Iraq, we are inflaming an entire region who already greatly dislikes us, creating more terrorist recruits every second we are there.
2. For a 'president' who is so focused on security for our country, why are our borders on each end wide open, in many areas, all that separates 2 countries is a small ditch that a 3 year old could crawl across. In many places even less security.
3. Only a tiny percentage of the millions of shipping containers that come into this country are inspected, quite a few come packed with immigrants looking to make a better life in this country. All it would take is one chemical /viral/ dirty/ nuclear bomb in 1 container to kill thousands if not millions of citizens.

2007-04-30 02:01:51 · answer #1 · answered by Norsehawk 4 · 0 3

even as you're accurate, both had possibilities and both blew them. yet, Clinton did have about 10 sturdy possibilities to take Bin encumbered out, this coming from the CIA. they'd the precise circumstances and places of him, yet each and each and every time Clinton said the collateral damage might want to be too severe, so he enable him flow each and each and every time. do not get me incorrect, i'm no Bush supporter, so my answer isn't a professional-Bush/anti-Clinton rant or finger pointing. Bush also had a window of chance to blaze Osama on a bridge in Afghanistan, yet hesitated and he were given away. for my section, Osama is only a poster boy and financier. no longer all that major. we ought to continually flow after his mentor, Ayman al-Zawahiri, the ideologue it extremely is to blame for replacing 1000's of muslims to extremism. If Osama is killed, he would get replaced and celebrated as a martyr.

2016-11-23 16:53:31 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Idiots like you!! You need to study this matter. Senator McCain knows what war can do. Remember he was a POW for several years during VietNam. He is the only candidate that truly understands war. I would blame the those who want the war-- the citizens of Iran, Iraq and Sudan.

2007-04-30 01:59:27 · answer #3 · answered by Banderagal 2 · 4 0

Personally, I'd blame Pelosi and Reid for creating the perception that there are two governments here before blaming Bush, but the real fault would lie with the government that sent the nukes. That's most likely to be Iran, since your buddy Ahminajad has threatened to use them, unlike anyone else in the world.

2007-04-30 01:48:25 · answer #4 · answered by open4one 7 · 5 2

I would blame Einstein, he made it all possible (and they said he was smart...yeah right) If you really are that against war for oil you should show your convictions by not using your computer any more since it was most likely transported to the store by a gas using truck...gasp!!! Its ok to talk the talk but walk the walk mr lib by never riding in a car again and never using anything transported by truck, including groceries

2007-04-30 01:50:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

you can blame any phantom you want but it will be neither bin laden nor bush's fault if the u.s. gets nuked...the blame will and should rightly fall squarely on the shoulders of the ENTIRE democrat party!...if i had my way, the whole stinkin' lot of them would be lined up against a wall and shot for being the treasonous snakes they are!

2007-04-30 02:13:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

We ain't gettin bombed. I think you should stop smoking whatever it is that is distorting the good mind that God gave you and focus on more constructive endeavors that you can actually have an influence on.

2007-04-30 01:47:54 · answer #7 · answered by Awesome Bill 7 · 4 0

I wouldnt look to blame anyone. What I would do is go into my bosses office and demand a pay raise.

2007-04-30 01:53:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I would blame Robert Oppenheimer.

2007-04-30 01:45:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I would blame Bush because his incompetence is creating more terrorist and he refuses to invade the worlds largest terrorist training ground, Pakistan. Pakistan will be where the terrorist get their nuclear weapon from.

2007-04-30 01:57:27 · answer #10 · answered by Al Dave Ismail 7 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers