English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

You've revealed a great truth and hypocrisy of our age. The answer is that the disgusting liberals believe that a woman's so-called "choice" is the determining factor regarding the validity of life. In their limited mental capacity, the "choice" to murder one's own infant makes it okay, but someone else doing this deed makes it not okay.

Those people who think like that are sick and need to be committed to an insane asylum.

Now, notice that the liberals are laying low on this one, because you've GOT THEM! They know that it's strategically correct to remain silent when they're overcome in a debate (rather than draw attention to their defeat), and to simply allow the post to float off of the page as quickly as possible.

Well, I do see that we have a response from the liberal, Philip below. Look at how eloquent it is. This is typical of their mentality, and he probably goes around screwing women at random, not caring about the consequences of his actions.

2007-04-29 18:12:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

It isn't possible to make one a crime and the other not a crime. It is just society's way of getting rid of the unwanted. The mid-term partial birth abortions are done on a technicality only because the baby is turned upside down and pulled out feet first. This keeps the head in the birth canal, and there the doctor is allowed to kill the baby by stabbing in the back of the skull, and it be called an abortion.

Simple solution to most unwanted pregnancies would be to abstain or use birth control each and every time a person has sex, or make sure the morning after pill is available for every woman and child, especially in the event of a rape.

2007-04-29 18:13:20 · answer #2 · answered by Sparkles 7 · 1 1

first of all: resources are your friends! convey them anyplace you bypass! Secondly: maximum guidelines invoked in double homicide trials will very from state to state, yet maximum of them matter on the degree of the being pregnant. In some states the homicide of a pregnant woman can comprise a cost of manslaughter to comprise the fetus. In Colorado, if a lady is murdered after her twenty 2d week of being pregnant it really is considered a double homicide. This regulation besides the indisputable fact that develop into only enacted many years in the past contained in the aftermath of a really brutal rape/homicide of a pregnant youngster. As yet another poster has already suggested there's a reduce on how lengthy a lady can wait beforehand she is now not eligible for an abortion.

2016-12-05 02:26:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Abortion is a woman's choice. The baby she's carrying is a parasite to her body for 9 months. Depending on food, nourishment, etc. etc. etc. On the effects of this, a woman should have the rights to choose if this baby who is continually taking from her is to live or not.

But someone going off and killing a pregnant woman is double homicide because you're murdering both a woman and an unborn child. You didn't know if that woman wanted to keep her baby or not. You didn't know how proud she might have felt soon to become a mother. Therefore, it's charged as double homicide.


The discussion of abortion is absolutely unnecessary. If you don't believe in abortion, don't have an abortion. But if a woman wishes to go off and have one, that's her rights.

2007-04-29 18:54:25 · answer #4 · answered by Jeremiah 5 · 1 1

Because she didn't terminate the pregnancy and was murdered before the child was born.

I could never file an abuse petition on a mother using crack with an unborn child as the courts DO NOT recognize a fetus as a child! Neither does the medical profession!

Those laws are fairly recent, are probably unconstitutional, and have nothing to do with you making a person carry a child to term, even if the mother is a child. Then you won't support them. You are like Pontious Pilot! I think if they die giving birth you should be charged with murder!

2007-04-29 18:25:21 · answer #5 · answered by cantcu 7 · 3 1

It's only got the *potential* for being charged as a double homicide in *some states*. Do research.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:FETICIDEMAP.png

Article on exactly your conundrum.

http://www.dailyrecord.com/news/03/04/20/news3-laci.htm

And why can't people intelligently debate a subject without tossing hate at each other about conservatives or liberals? Grow up, people. It's very unbecoming and immature.

2007-04-29 19:17:21 · answer #6 · answered by dark_reaction 3 · 0 1

I am not a 100% sure if people do get convicted of double homicide for killing a pregnant woman. Not sure if I ever heard the case at least.

2007-04-29 18:21:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

its because of the mix of liberal foolishness and Conservative truth.
many liberals believe that it is not a life until it can talk to you at the age of 2 while extreme Conservatives see it as a life from the time the sperm gets through the cervix
I say when the heart starts to beat it is murder to stop it. because others reason as I do, this is why a abortion is restricted to earlier in the pregnancy.

2007-04-29 18:17:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Why is it call murder when the foetus cannot survive out of the mother's womb while it is okay to jerk off every night with so many millions of semen going down the drain?

2007-04-29 18:21:46 · answer #9 · answered by Magma H 6 · 4 2

Shut The Hell Up!

Cuz The Supreme Court Says So


Lalalalalalalalalala....Can You Smell What The Court Is Cooking?!?!

2007-04-29 18:13:54 · answer #10 · answered by Phillip 3 · 3 4

fedest.com, questions and answers