2007-04-29 16:50:41 · 29 answers · asked by Mother 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The Democrats will change their stand on the Iraq war in case Hillary Clinton is elected because they will protect their party.
2007-04-29 17:05:22 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The first thing that she has to do is to get rid of Ben Ladin and then to bring our troops home. Knowing William Clinton he wasted his 8 years in office and now you tell us that Hillary is going to be our next president!!!! Even I took a random survey and the people that I asked told me that they hate Hillary and don't see her as being the next president. This survey was taken on my free time
in which I began from San Francisco all the way down to San Diego in California that began since January of 2007.
Nobody is going to back her up! Because she married William Clinton, she learned quick to cheat and to tell lies. Be prepared that the interest rates are going to go down if she is elected
president.
2007-04-29 18:31:50 · answer #2 · answered by soar_2307 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Are you kidding, the libs will find all of the reasons to say
we should be there despite the fact that it would be the
same thing Bush is saying. Congress will give her the money
and there won't be any strings attached to it either just more
PORK and she will sign away.
All of the libs will tell you yes to day until it happens then they
will deny doing so. I will tell you this, if elected (God forbid)
and she did decide to keep the troops over there I would
support her decision. Not because I'm liberal (no way Jose)
but I think we are doing the right thing.
Travolta: Why would leftwingers protest the death penalty and
support abortion, isn't it the same thing...typical hypocrisy
2007-04-29 17:10:05 · answer #3 · answered by justgetitright 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
very few must have examine this questions and extremely few responded it besides the indisputable fact that i'm also between them a citizen of us of a beforehand an Indian as we gained't stay a citizen of two international places because being American resident we are no extra Indian yet we can visit our mom land for ever and are loose to stay there too loosing all advantages if we stay longer i imagine , each body loves peace and hate an section the position there is not any safe practices . when I see terrorism is a global issue each body might want to play his or her function . even as Malala a muslim woman can strive against for training of females ,even as a baby needs his or her freedom a terrorist lives in terror and under no circumstances loose from its outcomes ,an afternoon might want to come even as human beings might want to come ahead to wipe it from human minds besides the indisputable fact that it really is too previous due already , there are such dissimilar technique of destruction to wipe finished humanity if mandatory action isn't taken quicker . i'm too small to take any action ,yet all type of violent videos should be removed from media so as that we do not have get admission to to them by any skill . human beings can lease most of those videos for couple money and upward thrust as a lot as strive against with kinfolk contributors then to next neighbor then at artwork then someplace at procuring mall ,then anyplace he does not imagine perfect triggered through media and aspects he can get admission to from cafes and well known man or woman dollar who provide this freedom so really . Then we attempt to calm the thoughts it really is already bombarded with a lot unfavourable training around the international .
2016-12-05 02:23:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like her husband, former President William Jefferson Clinton, she will get very little approval from her party to maintain the troops in Iraq.
2007-04-29 17:47:24 · answer #5 · answered by conde_c_b 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I like u glad u are on 2 nite. I predict she will move in and hit Iran. Watch her statements closely. Hard to tell she lies so easily. But she gives clues. "If a threat were.. I would see no option but to use forces necessary" I can't quote just subtext.
She has alot of hussling to do because truth be told these guys knew pre 911 I completely believe that. Fool us get in office and foil us for more personal gain. Damn them Clintons.
Will anyone complain. U bettcha too late they are in office. WJ tried to extend a Presidental term his last stint there to change the 2 term law. Chelsea is waiting we could be in for years of Clinton Camelot. With a dash of Jeb Bush for salt.
Also bet. She will institute a draft. Just watch her.
xo Kimba
2007-04-29 17:01:51 · answer #6 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I believe she would keep the troops in Iraq, at least I hope she would. I think she's a smart lady. I don't know what liberal Dems do.
2007-04-29 16:54:38 · answer #7 · answered by averagebear 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
The way she's been speaking this past week, this isn't going to happen.
She's on an anti-Iraq war track. And it would be insanity to keep our best forces in play there when they could be doing something meaningful like finishing up George Tenet's plans in Afghanistan.
Go get the terrorists where they're hiding.
2007-04-29 16:55:34 · answer #8 · answered by Floyd G 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
The word should be "presidentrix," or something like that. It's a truly sickening thought that the Clinton regime could be resurrected for up to a total of 16 years of tyranny.
I think that somehow, this should be unconstitutional.
2007-04-29 16:53:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
I can't speak for other liberals, but I certainly will. I suspect a large majority will protest regardless of their political persuasion.
Just look at the polls: over 60% want us out! America is speaking loud and clear but our current pResident refuses to hear...
2007-04-29 16:55:05 · answer #10 · answered by Sangria 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋