Well, I like Nirvana, but I think you're right.. From what I gather, at the time they were actually making music, they weren't that popular. And after they started gaining some popularity, Kurt killed himself, and I think that really pushed their music into the limelight. I think that if he hadn't killed himself, they would have had a couple popular songs and then they would've faded out. I'd say they might still be recording today, but I'm not sure if anybody would be buying. Everyone loves a tragic death, I mean look at Marilyn Monroe, James Dean, Kennedy.... we love stuff like that. We worship those people mainly b/c they died.
2007-04-29 15:21:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by F.J. 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think they were all that important, to be honest. I like them, but I don't love them. When you look at bands from the 1960s and 1970s, Nirvana were never as good as any of them. Kurt was a terrible guitar player, but a good lyricist. That's all they really had going for them, in my honest opinion.
2007-04-29 15:14:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Trick of the Tail 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nirvana had a major impact in the world of popular music. Before them, most of what you heard on the radio in rock circles were major label bands such as the butt-rock bands that dominated the mid to late 80's such as Warrant, Poison, or Motley Crue. When "Smells Like Teen Spirit" exploded, it gave exposure to the indie labels and the bands that had influenced them. While I don't feel Nirvana was the greatest band, I do appreciate their contribution to music.
2007-04-29 16:27:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Huevo 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kurt never WANTED to be important like that. The popularity of his songs contributed to his depression. He wanted to be an underground, angry artist. When his biggest digs at the world made the world happy, he couldn't take it.
Despite some world-changing moments, I don't think Nirvana was that important simply because, like Lynyrd Skynyrd of southern/country rock and Aaliyah of hip-hop, Mr. Cobain never got to finish his calling.
2007-04-29 15:15:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Your Uncle Dodge! 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
It relies upon on the Buddhism. The Buddha taught particularly some issues to distinctive human beings. in the direction of the top of his existence he taught the Lotus Sutra, which redefined Nirvana as no longer the top of rebirth, yet as a assessment of samsara. Nirvana isn't the top of rebirth, it resides in peace with it, taking area in it, employing it to create and to connect and be good and loving. inspite of your view of Nirvana, the element is that that's a state without suffering. while you're ill of suffering, Buddhism can help.
2016-10-14 03:26:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In my opinion...no. I'm not a fan at all. I think most of their songs sounded the same. The only one I like is Heart-Shaped Box with Evanescence doing the cover. I really don't think they would even be recording now if Kurt were still alive.
2007-04-29 15:14:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by girls_lie_too86 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Of course they would. They were one of they only grunge bands besides Pearl Jam and many bands cite Nirvana as an influence. They made great music and will forever be remembered.
2007-04-29 15:14:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Illusen ♫ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i do think they were actually very unique for their time and among the pioneers of the grunge stuff. so, yes, i think they were musically important but as far as being idolized, i do think a lot of that is sensationalism over kurt cobain's suicide.
2007-04-29 15:17:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by sweetpea 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
like the beatles they were the iconic vision of a generation. they were huge before kurt died.
2007-04-29 15:18:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Apparently you didn't have to suffer through the 80's glam Rock scene...Nirvana was thats scenes death nail...
2007-04-29 15:18:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by yerdun 1
·
1⤊
0⤋