So you were impressed with that rely... retaliate??? HOW? We have enemies in the free world now... and , of course, in the Middle East. How the hell would she retaliate? Our Armies are in their 3rd and 4th deployments. Our debt is enormous and spinning out of control. We have no credibility with our few Allies. How in the world would she retaliate ??? We need much more than her Girl Scout mentality to run this country. As for husband Bill, her great advisor, remember that he fired a couple rounds of missiles at some Middle East tents, yawned, then went back to Monica.
2007-04-29 13:50:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, i think of hilary is a sturdy woman who is familiar with that she needs. she doesnt appear as if somebody who'd permit her husband rule the country for her! and besides i think of bill would be too busy to rigidity approximately this project to plenty. If she wins she may be the only runing the country simply by fact she might do basically as a reliable a job as the different guy, interior the case bill clinton.
2016-12-10 14:58:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would be another lie that could not be backed up by reality. If she didn't want him involved she should have done the right think back when he cheated on her. It only proves that she avoids confrontation and does what helps her own image only and not the right thing to do. As the spouse how could she not have him involved in affairs. he would have access, as a former President to most confidential record. She would also have people that were loyal to Bill working for her, so , somehow he would still be involved.
2007-04-30 06:34:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by meathead 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bill Clinton should be Ambassador to the world
if GWB had avenged the attacks of 9-11 by going after Osama bin Laden and the Al Qaeda network, instead of invading Iraq and toppling Saddam, the USA might be safer, but not yet safe
2007-04-29 13:46:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by neddie 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
would you expect a person running for president to say anything else? They all say what they think we want them to say and personally I would not vote for Hillary because short of a lobotamy she couldnt keep billy out of the house and personally I am not against a woman as president but I think in reality the country isnt ready for one-at least not yet. and talk bout the mother of run on sentecences.
2007-04-29 13:48:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by molly 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Another empty-headed reactionary isn't any better, even if they have the Democrat stamp-of-approval on them.
Interventionism is a major platform of "both" major US parties, so there's not much of a difference voting for tweedledee or tweedledum..
2007-04-29 13:45:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hillary and Bill are a great team, many here will vote for them. They are very much in love and are prepared to face Americas difficult problems.
2007-04-29 14:09:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by GO HILLARY 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
I'd rather vote for Bush again than see Hillary take over & I think Bush is the worst President in US history. I'd even take Bill again as President. Anything but that commie biiittch.
2007-04-29 13:45:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
I'd rather have Bill as a president again a thousand times more than that she-male.
2007-04-29 13:51:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
NO!!! you might want to know what she would really do, seeing as this is what she said based on a debate...which her campaign has her saying cause it makes her look strong.
2007-04-30 00:39:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by 69Stang 4
·
1⤊
0⤋