English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Fire can't melt steel, RIGHT?

"Witnesses reported flames rising up to 200 feet into the air. Heat exceeded 2,750 degrees and caused the steel beams holding up the interchange from eastbound I-80 to eastbound Interstate 580 above to buckle and bolts holding the structure together to melt, leading to the collapse, California Department of Transportation director Will Kempton said."

2007-04-29 13:19:16 · 25 answers · asked by BAARAAACK 5 in Politics & Government Politics

25 answers

After the Libs made Dubya give up his "Operation Katrina" machine, and Americans discovered our evil Republican plot to blow up the world trade center we had to come up with something new. This was definitely an inside job. Late last night Dubya and Dick went down to San Fran and planted explosives on the Highway. It was the perfect plan! Rove was even piloting Air Force One. Early this morning Rosie stated, "It was the first time in history fuel burned." She's on to us again guys. We've got ot do something about Rosie O'Donald. We are no match for her vast intellect. Someone call the Donald. I'll get busy on the Internet trying to cover this up and make it look like an "accident."

2007-04-29 13:32:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Contrary to your narrow belief, a vast majority of liberals do not believe 9-11 was an inside job.

Anyone who says fire cannot melt steel has no knowledge of physics and/or chemistry. All that is needed to do so is a good fuel source and a good source of oxygen.

In the case of the underpass, it acted almost like a blower in a forge. Oxygen was rushing in to feed the fire which caused it to burn the fuel with more intensity. Bingo. You 've turned a fuel fire into a 200 ft. blow torch.

~X~

2007-04-29 13:49:07 · answer #2 · answered by X 4 · 1 1

i've got constantly pronounced that 9/11 became in no way a central authority conspiracy, why do you're taking the small share of persons who're claiming it incredibly is a conspiracy and generalize that each physique "liberals" are doing this? extra cheating habit on your area

2016-12-29 17:42:56 · answer #3 · answered by purgason 3 · 0 0

Hey X since you are a liberal it would be nice if you would say things when certain dunderheads liberal like Rosie O'Donnell says that steel don't burn instead of just letting Conservative attack her. When Conservatives say dumb stuff I light into them even though I am conservative..... truth is truth.

2007-04-30 04:49:45 · answer #4 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 0 0

It wasn't a truck, the freeway was demolished using a satellite earthquake making machine.

2007-04-29 13:22:34 · answer #5 · answered by wigginsray 7 · 2 0

No.

Cons, did Clinton blow up the freeway in San Fran today?

2007-04-29 13:21:39 · answer #6 · answered by ck4829 7 · 0 3

He did it just to inconvience those darn cali for ni ah Liberals.

2007-04-29 13:23:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think people in San Fran need help when it comes to BLOWING thinks up.

2007-04-29 13:56:04 · answer #8 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3 0

it was all the methane gas coming from san fran. been building up for years and finally blew!

2007-04-29 13:31:51 · answer #9 · answered by Mustardseed 6 · 0 0

I was wondering when someone was going to ask that. They would find a way to link that fire to him wouldn't they?

2007-04-29 13:29:12 · answer #10 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers