English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

You'll have to do your own homework.

2007-04-29 11:30:05 · answer #1 · answered by cireengineering 6 · 0 0

The whole basis of the Nazi Party was "racial purification". If you weren't a part of the aryan race, you were to be eventually eliminated or put to use as a slave. Hitler put in to effect the killing of children who weren't genetically suitable (such as mental retardation, multiple schlerosis, etc) even in his own country. Had Germany taken over the world, everyone who didn't have pure aryan blood would be a second-class citizen at best or dead. Germany losing the war caused an opposite reaction to such notions throughout the world and civil rights movements were given far greater support as a result.

2007-04-29 11:40:18 · answer #2 · answered by Nicktu 2 · 0 0

First of all, that's an absolutely ridiculous statement.

Very tangentially to Hitler, blacks did start to make serious civil rights gains during World War II. And Jesse Owens sticking it to Hitler in the 1936 Berlin Olympics was a source of pride for Americans, despite the fact he was black (in part because Hitler's aryan supremacy was too much for even most racist Americans, and the rest of America, too)

2007-04-29 11:33:48 · answer #3 · answered by EA I 1 · 0 0

The antiwar circulate piggybacked on the Civil Rights circulate. They were both element of a higher circulate called the counterculture, the little ones circulate, the hot-left, and more than a number of alternative names. all of them took their lead from Karl Marx's practise of Communism. They weren't a lot "appropriate" as they supported one yet another's schedule.... through how, there grow to be no race disparity in Vietnam. Fewer Black's served through % than their usual numbers interior the inhabitants might want to have predicted. That the Vietnam conflict grow to be one way or the different a "Black guy's (or perchance a nasty guy's) conflict is in simple terms yet another fantasy floated through the antiwar circulate and jumped on through the Civil Rights activists of the day.

2016-11-23 15:37:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

there was a civil rights movement in 1950?

2007-04-29 11:31:33 · answer #5 · answered by akablueeye 4 · 0 0

I can't it is not factual. The civil rights movement had nothing to do with Hitler.

2007-04-29 11:40:51 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

African-Americans who served in the war demanded their rights after they got home.

2007-04-29 11:31:46 · answer #7 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 0 0

All of history has it's imprint on points of issue in future times

2007-04-29 11:30:53 · answer #8 · answered by Don W 6 · 0 0

T'was brillig and the slithey toves did gyre and gimbol in the wabe.

2007-04-29 11:31:25 · answer #9 · answered by bullwinkle 5 · 0 0

DRUG induced dream
is the only explanation possible

2007-04-29 11:31:20 · answer #10 · answered by BUILD THE WALL 4 · 0 0

The ramblings of an idiot

2007-04-29 11:31:11 · answer #11 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers