Is Bush a Danger to America??

Question

Under Bush, America has spent almost a Trillion dollars to topple Saddam Hussein, just so he can settle a family feud and send some of his buddies down there to pump oil. He is using his office to make personal dealings using public funds and the military.

Under Bush, America has created millions of enemies and deep distrust even from our Allies. Millions more anti-US potential terrorists exist now than pre-9/11.

Bush has snuffed the Kyoto Treaty which is supposed to be a world-wide effort to ensure that future generations will be able to enjoy a clean, livable planet.

Because of Bush, Russia has threatened to re-arm and ignore international treaties, because Bush is ignoring such treaties and pretty much does what he pleases without UN agreements. People fear a re-emergence of the East-West conflict of the Cold-war era.

Under Bush, China has quietly surpassed the US as world's second largest exporter, only behind Germany.

All these things are happening. Bush is ruining us!

Answer 1

President of the United States of America is NOT A DANGER to neither the United States of America or to the World. He is a man who is ahead of his times and understands the dangers that face both the United States of America and The World if Harm and Evil are not taken care of. Americans and Citizens of the World who believe his policies are wrong now are going to say 10 years from now that George Walker Bush make great influencial decisions to make Planet Earth a better place.

I approve of George W. Bush, Always Have and Always Will and I truely believe that George W. Bush is an Awesome President who is compassionate and caring for all people all over the world and in the United States of America and I will miss him when he leaves office. I do hope that his brother John Ellis "Jeb" Bush runs for President in 2008 and WINS, that way Americans who do not like George W. Bush can deal with another Four Years of another President Bush related to the current President Bush and know what it is like to live in a country where you have to deal with the same leader or relatives of the same leader for long periods of time.

Answer 2

Just wondering why you would ask a question like this, when already have an answer that you're happy with. I'm neither a democrat nor republican, but allow me to give a few responses.

Regarding your point ... "Under Bush, America has spent almost a Trillion dollars to topple Saddam Hussein, just so he can settle a family feud and send some of his buddies down there to pump oil. He is using his office to make personal dealings using public funds and the military." You don't really have any facts to support this, do you. The US isn't pumping Iraqi oil. As far as the reasoning to toppling Hussein, remember that even the UN had said that Iraq had violated 17 UN resolutions, and practically every intelligence agency on earth said that he had WMDs (he even bragged of having them). I have no idea why we didn't find them. Was Hussein lying about having them? Did he send them to Syria (or elsewhere) before we invaded? I have no idea, and since he's dead, we will never know.

"Under Bush, America has created millions of enemies and deep distrust even from our Allies. Millions more anti-US potential terrorists exist now than pre-9/11." So, I guess we shouldn't have responded at all to 9/11.

"Bush has snuffed the Kyoto Treaty which is supposed to be a world-wide effort to ensure that future generations will be able to enjoy a clean, livable planet." We snubbed the treaty mainly because China is immune from it. And, as you correctly point out, they are becoming an economic superpower. We already have enough problems with Chinese competition ... this is something we don't need.

"Because of Bush, Russia has threatened to re-arm and ignore international treaties, because Bush is ignoring such treaties and pretty much does what he pleases without UN agreements. People fear a re-emergence of the East-West conflict of the Cold-war era." You're not giving Putin enough credit. Putin has basically dissolved the democracy set up by Yeltsin and created an autocracy. Bush (like Clinton, Bush 1, and Reagan) wants a missle defense system. But, Russia doesn't want us to have one. I wonder why?

"Under Bush, China has quietly surpassed the US as world's second largest exporter, only behind Germany." Where have you been for the last 30 years? This is nothing quiet about this! China has been moving forward rapidly since the 1970s. US manufacturers, labor unions, congressional legislation, have all helped them.

I'm not necessarily a Bush supporter. But, I do agree with him on one important point. Just imagine how much better the world would be if we had stable democracies in Afghanistan and Iraq. Is Bush's plan the ONLY way to go about it? Of course not. Is it the BEST way? I have no idea, and I certainly haven't heard any constructive suggestions on this from anyone else.

Answer 3

This global war on terrorism was expected and already named in the 90s. The world has had these terrorist enemies for many decades. More have been accumulated because the population has grown, and the suicide bombers now include women and children. Twenty years ago we did not hear of half the bombings done at that time. There was no world- wide web or satellite TV. The terrorists now also receive all our published news and war strategy plans. So the public must stop excerising their rights by demanding to know them.

President Bush has been pre-occupied trying to save our air from nuclear fallout. He made one slight mistake by not saying; Mr. Gore, you want to be in charge of the environment, by all means please take the job. If it was easy someone else would be doing it and thank you from the future generations to come. Then you mentioned Russia, like I said; Mr. Bush is preoccupied with nuclear fallout. And what were we warned about Iran?

I've voted for Bush twice, in 2004 and still in the beginning of 2005 every time I read the newspaper many news stories began with; yesterday former oilman George Bush…. I always became aggravated and thought; do you think the American people do not know that at least some of your family and friends still have interests in the oil industry? Part of this war does pertain to the future cost of oil.

Suddenly the light came on, and I realized when I had one chance to buy a potential race horse champion at the Hanover auction in Harrisburg Pennsylvania, I took along another more experienced trainer than myself. We should be grateful that former oilman President Bush would take the initiative of trying to decrease the future cost of oil. We cannot live without oil.

Germany has had us beat since the 70s, with the ultimate sounding stereo components. On the other hand, at least most of the people in China work for a living, however bad that life may be. Our government must finish what Clinton started by revamping the welfare system. If most of the welfare society is nonexistent by 2017 our worries over losing Social Security will also be gone. Illegal immigration and the welfare Society are the two largest factors in determining the flow of our future economy. I personally would rather see my tax dollars go toward this war effort, decreasing crime at home and because of the increase in our population; our sewer treatment plants must all be updated. Bush is not the danger to the U.S., presently some American's perspective is our worst enemy. Hope I answered your question.

Answer 4

I believe that it is impossible to know the depth of our position to properly answer this question. It is possible that we have taken the lesser of evils as a direction. To really try and understand this, you must be open minded. Look at peak oil and the big picture over the next forty to one hundred and forty years.
I know that on the surface Bush is terrible. But I am not certain that all is necessarily bad. Like I said don't judge a book by it's cover. The end may reveal a mystery beyond your preconceived understanding.

Answer 5

He is in danger alright ... but since he is in office, he only could do so much and personally, he really doesn't care too much about the opinions about what us American's are thinking. If you had noticed the ratings, he is doing a poor job, but he is also doing somewhat of a good job, but all he is doing is wasting all the hard earned money that us Americans had earned so far or had paid through taxes and he should have a limit to how much money he should spend on war and everything. My opinion, he is one of the worst presidents EVER and Lincoln is probably the best president so far.

Answer 6

they're issues which could in straightforward terms be chanced on after hundreds and hundreds of trials. and of path, strict restrict should be in place. in spite of the shown fact that, by using fact the inspiration of technological awareness is often changing by using new discoveries, we could desire to even have sympathy to the drug organisation to boot. they are not miracle makers, they only attempt to make earnings via merchandising something that they "think of" could help individuals. think of the international without antibiotics and different medicine, what number human beings could could desire to die? If we agree that technological awareness can get replaced, the drug organisation won't have an excuse of increasing medicine expenditures by using fact of regulation greater healthful.additionally if we seem on the different area that has used the socialist equipment it has slowed down and did no longer stay as much as its Utopian promise. No equipment is appropriate yet open and unfastened industry is the best obtainable.

Answer 7

Regarding China:

It's important to remember that throughout history (lets say the past 5000 years or so) China and India have consistently been the economic superpowers of this world. It is possible that the past 100/150 years has just been a blip and they are going to regain their prowess regardless of any one political leader. I don't think you can blame China on Bush.

Answer 8

he sucks.....i dont like him... he threats to veto that one Troop Withdrawal Plan

The Democratic-controlled House and Senate have passed different versions of the more than $120 billion spending bill, but both versions require American troops to begin to withdraw from Iraq. Bush has argued Congress has no right to set such timetables for troop withdrawals because they restrict his authority as commander in chief.

The president repeated Tuesday his vow to veto any bill that contains a withdrawal timetable if it arrives at his desk. The two houses of Congress have yet to work out the differences in their versions of the war spending plans.

Under the bill, the pullout would begin if the Pentagon cannot certify Iraqi progress in disarming militias, reducing sectarian violence and resolving political differences among the various Iraqi factions.

With a razor-thin majority in Congress, Democrats said they were well aware that they lack the votes to overcome Bush's threatened veto, and already were preparing for the next round of negotiations.

Answer 9

Bush is the most miserable president we ever had bad too the core .. Nixon will be deamed a better president than bush

Answer 10

Yes Bush is a danger. Go to these websites if you want to do something about it.

http://impeachforpeace.org
http://www.democrats.com