2007-04-29 09:11:59 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Well if you want them to go to Iraq send them with your
sisters and/or your Mother.
I oppose sending any woman to war, even if they enlist
they should not be put in harms way, there are plenty of
ways for women to serve their country.
It is the responsibility of us men to fight the battles, regardless
of you political standing.
2007-04-29 09:20:27 · answer #1 · answered by justgetitright 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We have an all volunteer military and have had for years. The brave heroes that serve our great nation are in Iraq and other places by choice. I am proud of them as I would be if one of the Bush twins were there. The same goes for Al Gore's kids, or Chelsea Clinton or any other politicians who belived we were doing the right thing when we invaded Iraq.
2007-04-29 20:21:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That would be a quick way to get the war ended. And I'm really tired of people saying at least Bush is doing something about terrorism. Iraq DID NOT terrorize us in any way.
2007-04-29 19:06:40 · answer #3 · answered by Lettie D 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um, No. And for everyone who is saying that Bush is sending other people's kids to Iraq, so he should send his own. That's crap. I don't really agree with the war, but the troops signed up for the armed forces, Bush didn't make them.
2007-04-29 16:45:51 · answer #4 · answered by Carys 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I wish the troops were home but I don't want to send over people who don't want to go. Which I'm sure is your point. Bush isn't going to admit he is wrong and it will take another administration in office before anything is done about it. I hope the draft isn't enforced. I don't want the safety of the soldiers in the hands of people who were forced to go.
2007-04-29 16:22:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
That would be interesting! I'll bet neither would be anywhere near Iraq if they did enlist in the military. If Bush can change his own TX National Guard records and stop the media from publishing his drug use in the 1970's and of course his drinking problems, what could he do to his own daughters records??
2007-04-29 16:17:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely not.
#1 -- It Is a volunteer military. NO ONE is SENT contrary to their choice.
#2 -- Their presence would be a cause of danger to themselves and their unit, the same as if Prince Harry of England goes. What price do you think the terrorists have on his head?
2007-04-29 17:35:55 · answer #7 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely, along with all the other Bush's, all the Cheney's, Condi Rice,Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Rush limbaugh and al;l the other creeps that are so in favor of this war.
One fact to stop wars, make it a law that all of the People involved in the decision to go to war, should have to themselves be in the war zone. From the men and women in the congress, senate and all of the parasites in governent including the president and his cabinet.
Presto, no more wars.
2007-04-29 16:22:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yes, but not a chance. That would be saying should George W. Bush have been sent to Vietnam?
2007-04-29 16:16:19 · answer #9 · answered by furrryyy 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, both Bush and Cheney should be sent there and put on the front line of the sitting duck squad.
2007-04-29 16:17:15 · answer #10 · answered by Retired From Y!A 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋