2007-04-29 07:57:45 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Assumes facts not in evidence, argumentative, calls for a legal conclusion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, It is a civil war, and they will keep at it.
2007-04-29 08:07:31 · answer #1 · answered by pedro 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How did we go from winning the war in Iraq to losing overnight? Was this decided by the same committee that changed "Peking" to "Beijing"?
These new linguistic conventions -- like going from "winning" to "losing" in Iraq -- simply spread like an invisible bacterial invasion.
It cannot be denied that for the past 50 years, Democrats have orchestrated humiliating foreign policy defeats for America. So it is understandable that some might interpret their midterm gains as a mandate for another humiliating defeat.
But that's not what the Democrats told Americans when they were running for office. To the contrary, they claimed to be gun-totin' hawks. A shockingly high number of Democratic candidates this year actually fought in wars. And not just the war on poverty, either -- real wars, against men with guns.
But the point is: You can't run as a phony patriot and then claim your victory is a mandate for surrender. That would be like awarding yourself undeserved Purple Hearts and then pretending to throw them over the White House wall in protest. No, that's not fair -- nothing could be as contemptible as throwing someone else's medals on the ground in protest.
Is it the report of the "Iraq Surrender Group" that suddenly caused everyone to say we're losing?
2007-04-29 08:13:58 · answer #2 · answered by bwlobo 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I doubt they are stupid to think that because America "surrendered" aka pulled out that they will have a straight road to attacking again. They have to deal with tribal leaders and the new Iraq authority, in which are opposed to the Al Qaeda.
2007-04-29 08:02:02 · answer #3 · answered by leikevy 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
With all the news reports from around the world and demoncrats running for president wanting to the first to surrender; they probably feel that they are on the right side and will continue to kill innocent western people with every chance.
It's a shame that the demoncrats just don't understand that with their words spoken here to get elected, other people really do believe the crap they spout.
2007-04-29 08:46:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Get real...America has never surrendered, and we aren't about to start.
2007-04-29 08:08:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know. I would sure like to see one of them being interviewed.
2007-04-29 08:12:57 · answer #6 · answered by XB 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They're wooping and firing their AK47's in the air and thinking Allah has given them victory so why don't they come attack the US itself
2007-04-29 08:00:49 · answer #7 · answered by sonfai81 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Emboldened, what all anti-American people wanted.
2007-04-29 08:25:58 · answer #8 · answered by tttplttttt 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Mad that they don't have more time to sell off their defense stocks.
2007-04-29 12:12:14 · answer #9 · answered by Mister2-15-2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what are you kidding
2007-04-29 08:00:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋