if Bush pulls the troops out like the Democrats want...?

Question

would Iraq turn into another Darfur? then as a result, would the Democrats blame Bush for it?

im not a Democrat or Republican. im just asking a question

Answer 1

Of course it would (in terms of violence and genocide), and of course they would. That's politics -- put all the blame on the other party. I don't approve of the way Bush has handled Iraq. I also do not approve of Democrats want to handle it, that is, abandon it.

Answer 2

I would say Iraq would eventually split into 3 parts, War and killings would be everywhere for a few years before that happens.

One would be another Islamic State in the south near the Iranian border, a rich oil state. The second a poor state consisting of Baghdad. The third, in the north the Kurds, where again the oil is rich.

Now the creatioon of a third Kurd state in the north would destabilize Turkey as those Kurds want a portion of Turkey returned to the Kurds. And Turkey is a NATO ally. So that creates a real problem for NATO.

Now the south state would want to Ally or become part of Iran, an Islamic Republic, and that would create problems for Saudi Arabia which has a different sect of Isalm.

Its totally impossible for the US to leave. They might cut back and form military bases around Iraq to defend its borders and not be involved with the police force duties.

Bush will leave office with a full force of about 20,000 in Iraq. Then a Demo will be elected and will TAKE A FEW MONTHS TO EVALUATE THE SITUTIATION. The Demo will come to their senses and leave 18,000 in Iraq.

So Demo or Repub neither can or ever will leave.

Easy to blame Bush, Remember Hillary, and all the Demo's voted to go to WAR. They had better or same info as Bush. No its BUSH'S FAULT Ha Ha Ha. What a joke that is.

Answer 3

First off I don't remember any US troops in Sudan, so how can Iraq be another Darfur. If you are going to compare you would have been better off using Beirut, Lebanon.

Secondly, what do you think is happening now, total chaos. Everyday people are dying from either car bombing or suicide bombing.

Finally, This war was lost when it became a policing action for the troops, Bush is only interested in the oil in Iraq and when it runs out the republicans will pull out.

Answer 4

Answer 1:
Probably. Nothing is certain.

Answer 2:
Yes, as the invasion was the brainchild of this administration.

That being said, the democrats are not blameless. A number of them voted for it. They may have changed their minds, but that does not absolve them of responsibility.

Although, even if each and everyone of the democrats voted against it, we would have still gone anyway as the republicans had a solid majority in congress.

But most of the blame lies at the feet of this administration.

~X~

Answer 5

If and only if Iraq is unable to (likely!) form an effective government, yes Iraq will turn into a very violent place and yes Bush will be blamed.

The reason Bush will be blamed is that HE intitiated the war. HE used false reports of WMD's and terrorist tie to gain approval for military action in Iraq. So HE has created a no-win situation.

Answer 6

It's a mess that's not going to get better if we stay our troops will keep dying because it's to late to change the administrations mistakes if we leave we tell the enemy they have defeated us.I say redaploy the troops to afganistan enter pakistan if we have to eliminate the true enemy then if we have to go back to iraq to clean up our mess do it with the power of the full military.

Answer 7

It doesn't matter if Bush pulls the troops out or not! You are not winning this one.

The Iraqi's don't want us there. It is their country we attacked illegally and we do not own their oil rights! We have been stealing their oil since we got there!

The current conflict is a civil war we allowed, or Bush allowed, to happen by not putting the needed troops in to quell it in the bud.

You got rid of Hussein. What government they have is up to them, and yes, if it is worse than Hussein, who we also put into power, so be it. Then let the world community deal with it!

Bush started a illegal war on lies. He owns it!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjFrezxIMAQ&mode=related&search=

Answer 8

No. i might blame it on the centuries-previous background of conflict between Sunnis and Shiites. Ever with the aid of fact the "professional" war ended, acts of violence between the two communities has been ongoing. Neither the war nor the tries to create a democracy somewhat had numerous a huge gamble to end that conflict.

Answer 9

Probably, lol. Democrats like to blame everyone else but themselves.

Answer 10

The inescapable truth is WE SHOULD HAVE NEVER INVADED IRAQ to begin with.
THIS IS MAJOR PROBLEM YOU REPUBLICANS HAVE IN WRAPPING YOUR HEADS AROUND.
This argument of yours is without merit, it shifts blame onto others who are NOT the ones who advocated the dilemma that the whole sick Bush regime finds itself in.