English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

when it comes to umpires why some fans think umpires are "Always" pardenable?-.
.its Unbeleivabe,isn't it?
plz explain why everybody "submissive "
towards Umpires?

Why humans sooo scared to stand tall against >
BIG BAD BEAST?..I mean ..("Unjust")

how come they always get away with these crimes?
Does World Cup "sporting event ...or....
Gambling Event...?

.Any Human umpire subjected to Bribes .
Honestly do you think umpires are "Sin-less"pure Souls?
i mean Noble?
Bad weather ,bad weather, bad umpiring..etc & etc..
What's wrong with these people?
Are they Invertabrates?(spineless)
Unbeleivably Submissive?
They were even in hurry to "finish-off"
the final with "bad light"
isn't it fishy..my dear friend?

2007-04-29 07:32:50 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Cricket

10 answers

Bad umpiring is witnessed in every match.in today's circket poor decisions have taken the flavor out of the game.
the governing body to take action is ICC,they take decisions to protect whom?we all know the answer,
Cricket is a much bigger game in our continent so we should have a system to set things right rather than complaining matters to ICC,Than all the issues will fall in place.

2007-05-04 23:59:17 · answer #1 · answered by SRK'S KNIGHT RIDERS 4 · 0 0

Match referee Jeff Crowe has admitted that a blunder by him and the umpires caused the farcical scenes at the end of the World Cup final.

When Sri Lanka and Australia came off for bad light with three overs left, they were told the game would have to be completed the next day.

The two captains instead opted to finish the game in near darkness.

"The game was technically over because a 20-over match had been completed," Crowe acknowledged.

"This was a mistake on our behalf as the playing control team."

Sri Lanka skipper Mahela Jayawardene said afterwards that he knew the rules but the umpires had insisted they would have to come back on Sunday.

"We were all confused ourselves as to what the right direction was and how we were going to play it. In hindsight I should have known the rules and the game should been called off at that point," said Crowe.

It's a human error. A lot of us talk into the audio system we have on field and in our room. Sometimes you get a stronger voice that says 'I know the rules' and then you get confusion and no-one wants to overrule the other.

"I should have known and said 'That's not right. The game should be completed now'.

"We got our minds clouded over that whole simple issue. That was some voices reiterating what they felt was the right way to approach the end of the game and that was incorrect."

Despite admitting he was embarrassed for his team, Crowe said he would not resign and refused to blame off-field umpire Rudi Koertzen for believing the game could be completed on Sunday.

"Is this a resignation issue? I'll have to talk with my superiors on that," former New Zealand captain Crowe said.

"I hope not, it was a great thrill to be selected for this event but I guess you're always accountable and I am manager of the playing control team. What happened was my responsibility.

"We are a team, I want to reiterate that there were lot of voices heard throughout that time about what was the right method. It's a collective thing, we shouldn't pinpoint one or two people.

"I don't think it's Rudi's mistake. I think it's a collective mistake. Maybe Rudi might have suggested it early but that doesn't mean the two on-field umpires couldn't have overruled him," Crowe added.

2007-04-29 07:57:25 · answer #2 · answered by Ayaz Ali 4 · 1 0

While I agree that if the match could not be played for full quota of overs yesterday, the authorities could have postponed the match for the next day, as there as already a reserve day. But what is the guarantee that there will be no rain the next day and full quota of 50 overs is possible? If it rains next day also what happens?

First of all Umpires have gone by the rules of the game, which stipulates that a game can be played only if 20 overs are possible. When the rains stopped, Umpires found that 38 overs game is possible and accordingly they decided to go ahead with the game, for which how can Umpires can be blamed.

2007-04-29 07:45:44 · answer #3 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 1

there are Mafia activities-in 2007 cup> to give
Australia the well planned support.
but Asians Rules.
**!983-Kapil dev -won(India)
1992-pakistan won
1996-Sri lanka won
since 1992 Asian teams Qualified to Finals with Australia
2007 is the time who gave a biggest fight Aus and
It was Sri Lankans
and the final was didiculous .
2 worst decitions of worl cup finals given against sri lanka.
ICC could have called off the saturday match ,
because it was marred by constant arain ,bad weather
& bad light.
Instead when Australia got Advantage of the "ToSS"
& the start, everybody wanted to continue it ,
in order to make Australia "any how" the Winners.

they knew if they used the reserved day ,the Sunday
the toss & luck would have gone Sri lankans way.
They simply did not want to RISK it.
the money power & umpires always helped them to
your so called "Dominance"
Asians are the best
Even Bangladeshis beaten Bragging Ponting.
Everybody knows this truth .
but they dont want tell it ,
One of the reasons are, if they do ....
some of the "Australia backing-answerers "
use "bad words' to reply .
some Australian suporters always prefer worst
way possible to answer to the Secret of their
"Bribed -success"
other countries dont want to win by these unscrupulous means.

2007-04-30 03:18:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Obama was the only one who even had a ghost of a chance of being able to skim through the whole 1000-page bill. The Representatives and Senators had less than 24 hours. And even Obama needs a little R&R over the weekend, I guess. Pelosi's European vacation? Well, I guess someone has to stimulate the Italian economy, she's just doing her part.

2016-05-21 06:18:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

they were hurried because ,
speed himself agreed this world cup went too far
Speed himself is an OLD MAN,
like Bucknor and most of the others

they are not golden Oldies they are Olden oldies
yes i agree with "Ayas force for certain extend
but the question was quite reasonable
ICC jeff crow admited that too
but every possible reason was given quite intentionally towards
Australian win
If you are an-un- biased spectetor.

2007-04-29 08:19:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

They were hurry because it was the boring world cup in the history of world cup.

2007-05-03 23:29:52 · answer #7 · answered by fairy 6 · 0 0

it simply was unfair and worst world cup ,
may acomodation for the teams Ok
but even Ponting said otherwise.
Overallthe world cup gave youth who interested in cricket
bad impresion.Like cricket is sataged drama like
" wwf "
Wrestling.
it went according to Australian script.
so you are right.
its fishy.
but who is the culprit?

2007-04-29 13:13:03 · answer #8 · answered by ♥SMARNY♥ 6 · 1 2

very well written piece.... i gave you a star... I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU!!!

2007-05-04 18:28:12 · answer #9 · answered by Reflectionist 3 · 0 0

agree

2007-04-29 18:15:51 · answer #10 · answered by john 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers