English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

is it

famine and Aid spread throughout europe
trade was banned betweem western and eastern europe
governments failed to meet the needs of the people
or monarchies were reinstated in many nations

which 1 is it and why

2007-04-29 07:26:17 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities History

4 answers

The fundamental reason (leading to many other secondary, tertiary, reasons): the belief persistent in many human beings that statist coercion can solve problems as opposed to just creating more or just shifting existing problems elsewhere (which is all it does).

If you want to do something that does not hurt or aggress against me, and I forcibly stop you, you will get mad at me. As I would at you if the roles were reversed. You would remain mad at me until I stopped doing this to you (and probably even remain mad for some length of time after I stopped my initial aggression against you). If I did not stop the aggression and you were intent on doing what you wanted to do so as to satisfy the desire driving you to want to do it originally, you might try violence to get past me. If this was impossible... for instance, if I was restraining you under the threat of much bigger weapons than you had (as states do), you might then try to get what you want by aggressing against someone else instead. (The state pits people against each other in this manner all the time. For example, a man has little money and little opportunity since a government has taken so much of it from him and his community in taxes and other restrictions, so he attacks or steals from his neighbor to get what he otherwise freely could have purchased from his neighbor.)

Multiply this human action of aggressing against (or restraining) non-aggressing individuals millions of times over on a daily basis and you have what all state governments do. When the rage among the people subject to these government actions builds up, the government workers look to shift the blame for what they've done to other people. Sometimes it's a minority tribe, sometimes it's an ethnic or religious group, sometimes it's "the rich", etc. And as far as famine goes, look at every single famine (from Biblical times to Ukraine in the 1930s to North Korea in the 1990s to Africa in places now) and you will see a government responsible for it. (Weather and drought cause problems... but free people get around them without starving all the time. Only when they are trapped by government do they end up in a famine situation.)

The problem is attempting to coerce a non-aggressing other... even if one believes his doing so will solve a problem. It can't. It can only create more problems or shift the problems elsewhere. This is why all statist governments eventually collapse, why they always will, and why all statist government actions should be opposed. They aren't necessary. They don't serve people: they simply subjugate people for their own power and money... even when they claim to have good intentions.

2007-04-29 07:54:46 · answer #1 · answered by mdunlap151 1 · 0 0

Governments failed to meet the needs of the people. The totalitarian states of Germany and Italy under Nazism and Fascism came about through a definite and political instability and inability economically speaking to meet the needs of the people. War debts for Germany increased civilian unemployment and inflation that it took a wheelbarrow of marks to buy a loaf of bread. In Italy, the success of Versailles was short-lived as the people desired more stability but what they got was Mussolini and the so-called return of a Roman Empire.

2007-04-29 08:00:30 · answer #2 · answered by Dave aka Spider Monkey 7 · 0 0

After WW1 and WW2 the governments were sent in to a period of unrest. Not only were people shocked over what had happened but the financial repercussions were grave. People wanted the governments to do something, and when they didn`t seem to solve the problems, the more extreme sides gained more support in the peoples desperation.

2007-04-29 07:41:47 · answer #3 · answered by Victoria T 3 · 0 0

international conflict a million: a million)Franc Ferdinand Asassinated by Serbian Sparking international conflict a million 2)Germany march into Belgium, Britain declare conflict on Germany 3)German's U-2 submarines sink united statesS Lusitania 4)Zimmerman notes delivered the united statesinto conflict 5)Treaty of Versaille ended international conflict a million international conflict 2: a million)Germany invade Poland sparking international conflict 2 2)Japan attack Pearl Harbor bringing the united statesinto WW2 3)jap Internment camp, All jap in u . s . of america have been sent to camp for the time of the conflict 4)D-Day Allies ruin into Europe 5)Atomic Bomb dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki thoroughly destroying the citys.

2016-12-10 14:39:40 · answer #4 · answered by trickey 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers