Surely if he is as stupid and inept as they claim he is--then how is it he has managed to avoid impeachment for all his alleged crimes? It's obvious, even to me that he is not nearly as smart as Bill Clinton--yet Clinton WAS caught and impeached--albeit on a relatively minor crime--in the laundry list of the AGGREGIOUS CRIMINAL ACTIVITES we all know Clinton IS guilty of.
But your thoughts.....why no impeachment of GW?
2007-04-29 06:47:20 · 12 answers · asked by Cherie 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Sorry Elway--I don't buy your argument. If Bush is that stupid coupled with the fact that he is VERY unpopular-even within his own party--he'd have been caught.....had he done anything improper. Clinton on the other hand was so popular many were willing to take the fall for him. (Knowing full well a pardon was forthcoming.)
2007-04-29 06:57:23 · update #1
Kermit-your response is even more ludicrous! Why waste the time or money......uhm, that is all your party has been doing...Scooter Libby ring any bells? More importantly, if crimes are being comitted I want to see the offender be held accountable--regardless of political affiliation!
2007-04-29 07:00:10 · update #2
It is obvious why. THEY HAVE NO CRIME TO USE TO FILE IMPEACHMENT CHARGES. You can bet that their ACLU and other left wing yuks are working feverishly to come up with at least enough for another witch hunt. That is ANOTHER reason the democommies HATE him so much. Everything in his past that was a negative has already been disclosed and they are all so furious that they have to toil daily to keep their sordid pasts under wraps. You can tell by how he reacts to their slander and mud slinging that he has not been a politician long enough to COMPROMISE his position on ANYTHING, including the war on terror.
2007-04-29 07:02:08 · answer #1 · answered by just the facts 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because he is very well protected by those below him. That's all there is to it. Shyt runs downhill so the others take the heat: Libby, Rummy, Cheney, etc. It could be looked at as a tribute to the Republican Party protecting their own. But unfortunately, the house of cards is falling down all around him and his cronies. Consider that even when Clinton was being impeached his approval rating was higher than Bush's is now. Perception of corruption and the war in Iraq have crippled the Republican Party and really, they have done it to themselves by their efforts to protect Bush.
EDIT: And sorry, I have to disagree with you again, I never said Bush was stupid. He knows who to surround himself with, they have kept him safe and warm. That doesn't make him a figure to be admired, no matter the intelligence level.
2007-04-29 06:51:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
It has consistently been their objective to restrict private possession of weapons. yet whilst they reported that, they could have a conflict on their palms. so they could desire to flow at it bit via bit. you be attentive to, ban this one now and yet another one later. Liberals are affected person. They be attentive to that they could desire to institute issues slowly in the event that they have any desire of accomplishing their targets. in actuality, do a cyber web seek on sixty truths approximately liberals.
2016-10-14 02:26:54 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kucinich has filed to impeach Cheney.
Possibly the thinking is this: Dubya is too stupid to impeach--he has just been following a script that was written for him, and if his "writers" are taken out, Bush will just whither on the vine....
2007-04-29 06:56:50 · answer #4 · answered by Joey's Back 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Because Bush has committed no crimes to be charged with, and liberals have failed in their attempts to make it illegal to defend America.
2007-04-29 08:23:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
you must have an open , free and honest governmant in order to have an impeachment!
2007-04-29 06:57:56 · answer #6 · answered by garyfcorwin 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Do you know that they(all government officials) have Judicial Immunity.Police and Judges too.Not us, we are held to the letter of the B.S. laws.Freedom my @ss.
2007-04-29 07:58:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Doing so would mean they would have to make a case, which they don't have one.
2007-04-29 06:59:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
you must commit a crime to be impeached
2007-04-29 06:54:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
His only crime is trying to be non-partisan in his first term, see what that has gotten him.
2007-04-29 06:52:04 · answer #10 · answered by Armed Civilian 4 · 2⤊ 5⤋