Do you think the sport of cricket should be renamed "Aussie Rules"?

Question

i meant it as a joke & you guys are taking it sooooo seriously ! chill !

Answer 1

Good one ... man... instead start 2 kinds of WC one with Aus and another without

Answer 2

There could be little doubt that cricket is the national game. in spite of everything, being aussie cricket captain is asserted to be the 2d maximum intense place, after the PM. in spite of the undeniable fact that, in all honesty, i do no longer think of that oz..has a countrywide game, we are good at each little thing. i might guess that the main time-honored game, that's, the sport performed by using the main persons at one time or yet another for the time of their existence, may well be the two table tennis, tennis or golfing. in spite of everything, we've all had a pass at those, yet I even have in no way performed aussie regulations or soccer.

Answer 3

No. It wasn't "West Indian Rules" after 1975 and 1979 or "Indian Rules" after 1982. It is a fact that Australia can be tamed. The West Indies did it in 1975 and the feat was repeated by Sri Lanka in 1997. Australia is winning because it is a very good all round team and is very focussed on its ultimate target viz. winning the tournament. Other teams should look inwards to detect their deficiencies and borrow ideas for success from the Australians.

Answer 4

no Asia Rules
****
!983-Kapil dev -won(India)
1992-pakistan won
1996-Sri lanka won
since 1992 Asian teams Qualified to Finals with Australia
2007 is the time who gave a biggest fight Aus and
It was Sri Lankans
and the final was didiculous .
2 worst decitions of worl cup finals given against sri lanka.
ICC could have called off the saturday match ,
because it was marred by constant arain ,bad weather
& bad light.
Instead when Australia got Advantage of the "ToSS"
& the start, everybody wanted to continue it ,
in order to make Australia "any how" the Winners.

they knew if they used the reserved day ,the Sunday
the toss & luck would have gone Sri lankans way.
They simply did not want to RISK it.
the money power & umpires always helped them to
your so called "Dominance"
Asians are the best
Even Bangladeshis beaten Bragging Ponting.
Everybody knows this truth .
but they dont want tell it ,
One of the reasons are, if they do ....
some of the "Australia backing-answerers "
use "bad words' to reply .
some Australian suporters always prefer worst
way possible to answer to the Secret of their
"Bribed -success"
other countries dont want to win by these unscrupulous means.
"Ausies, Bookies & Briberis Rule"

Answer 5

Though Australia have been dominating the game of cricket for the past many years, the game should not be renamed as I feel that their dominance will end in the near future and other countries too emerge stronger.

Answer 6

Here we go again this is not on the Australian Cricket team won on its merits there was open decision making by both teams and if the inferior team had won the great and fair sporting Aussies would not have carried on like the sociopaths who are Slanka's supporters.

Answer 7

Australia cricket is not the Best. There are so many cricket teams who has def Australia. If they have been won world cup 4 times that doesn't mean they are the best. Did they won all world cups from 1975 to 2007?
West Indies def Australia in 1975
From 1979 to 1983 they couldn't even reach to final
In 1992 Australia wasn't in final
In 1996 Sri Lanka def Australia

Answer 8

Yes man its become so dominating and predictable that its become boring like hell. The ICC should help countries get cricketing standards up otherwise the day is not far when this game will lose its charm.

Answer 9

VERY FUNNY!!
An answer to Aze, sorry you weren't watching the same game as me! Sri Lanka were gone when Sanga and Jaya were out, if not from the first boundary Gilchrist struck!! Don't be such a sore loser.

Answer 10

uh...NO WAY!!!!Aussies didnt win becuz they were 2 good.They won becuz d organisation was so poor.What should have been a 38 over match 4 d Sri Lankans turned in2 a 36 over match 4 them.SL lost due 2 bad light and if it wasnt 4 that d Aussies would b flying home with NO cup.THE Sri Lankans couldnt see the ball and because of that d Aussies didnt win gracefully like people thought they would.No ,they didnt because Sri Lanka got close to winning than any other country this world cup 2 and they would have won 2 if it wasnt for DL and the mess mother nature got us in2.

Answer 11

ya maybe. It is so boring, i mean, any match in which the aussies play, we know that they will be the winners. cricket has become boring.... so, why not rename it? It would be appropiate only.