2007-04-28 22:39:36 · 6 answers · asked by 2kool4u 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Battlefields between soldiers, and trapped in an inescapable scenario facing certain death/ and suffrage to onset death.
2007-04-28 22:49:39 · answer #1 · answered by Swordfish 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes when there is no hope for a cure and they are suffering horribly. It should be a choice for the terminally ill person to make. I recently watched my sister die a long and painful death and she should have been able to choose to die easily as there was no hope.
2007-04-29 08:09:24 · answer #2 · answered by mnwomen 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
when the person is terminally ill and in pain and the doctors can't do anything more to ease intense pain then it should be justified.
2007-04-29 05:47:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
to answer this question, a 6 paged essay has to be written. and even after the essay is written, the question will still remain a mystery. thus, teachers like to give this question as an essay question for their students:)
2007-04-29 05:43:03 · answer #4 · answered by dan l 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
just like abortion, i don't think any one human can decide weather it is right or wrong.
i can imagine some instances where it could be the more humane thing to do.
2007-04-29 05:48:54 · answer #5 · answered by Kevy 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
when an animal is miserable and suffering then YES, esp if that animal has a disease that will kill them anyways..........
2007-04-29 05:55:04 · answer #6 · answered by waterlily750 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋