English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

when they dont even enlist for UN "Peace" missions?!
let alone fighting in Bosnia or Somalia????

Dont need to ask me do I server in Iraq or not because I am not the one calling anyone a coward.

2007-04-28 15:26:38 · 18 answers · asked by Samm 6 in Politics & Government Politics

18 answers

Thanks for pointing this out. I love how people think that because I support my husband I should also join and "fight for what I believe in" and that I'm "a coward" because I wont. I have to be here to support my husband, and also finish nursing school. Somehow libs think that even though I know pleanty of people in, I must join to prove my point as well.

2007-04-28 15:30:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Simple logic:

>at this point it is clear Bush wants Americans to surrender some--or all-- of our fundamental liberties in exchange for "security."

>the only people who continue to support Bush are therefore those who are willing to give up the rights our forefathers fought and died to give us--for the sake of "protection" from a bunch of camel-herders who flew a couple of planes into soeme buildings. And this is what they consider a "threat" to our way of life in the country that fought the two greatest military empires in world history--the Japanese and Nazis--at the same time and mopped the floor with them.

Al the while ignoring te fact that your supposed "Decider" ISN"T fighitng the terrorists--who are in Afghanistan--but invading a country that didn't have the WMD's--or the ties to terrorism--he falsly claimed.

And you're cheering while decent Americans sering their country--while you sit safe at home--die for your precious "Decider's" mistakes.

Maybe you don't call that cowardice. Anybody with an ounce of courage and patriotism does.

2007-04-28 15:34:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The main reason is because liberals are retaliating for a lot of cons calling THEM cowards. So the accusation that cons are "chicken hawks" comes up.

2007-04-28 15:52:28 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 1 1

I have called them illogical lemmings before, but I have never called them cowards. I have heard Liberals erroneously called cowards many times by the illogical lemmings.

2007-04-28 15:30:35 · answer #4 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1 1

I'm somewhat liberal but I never call Bush supporters cowards.

2007-04-28 15:29:04 · answer #5 · answered by the Boss 7 · 1 1

Politics is the artwork of spin. the unquestionably difference between modern political events are not that great, it is the spin the spin medical doctors and the media positioned on coverage that creates the belief of an ideological divide. interior the top it is the faceless adult men with the economics PHD's who administration the regulations of the incumbent.

2016-10-14 01:25:53 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I have never done that before in my entire life. If you wish to claim otherwise I simply demand that you present your evidence supporting this egregious accusation. If you are unable to do so I demand that you stop making sweeping generalizations about a group of people about which you know absolutely nothing.

2007-04-28 15:31:17 · answer #7 · answered by SomeGuy 6 · 2 1

Only 7% of the military is liberal.
And conservatives are cowards!?

2007-04-28 15:29:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Idealism versus realism. When one espouses unworkable ideals, the only recourse is to use emotion evoking utterings because thinking and logic doesn't apply. For radical liberals, idealism trumps realism.

2007-04-28 15:48:28 · answer #9 · answered by WhatBrain? 7 · 1 1

Liberals are still hurting over loosing the last two election. Bad sportsmanship I say.lol

2007-04-28 15:42:38 · answer #10 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers