Armored cars ,now delayed,because of the Dem,s ,idiot troop withdraw date,or is it Bush,s fault?

Question

did not bush warn those dem,s that he would veto the coward act bill?

also a shortage of bullets and general war supplies,thanks dem,s whats next,direct talks with the terrorist? not on my shift...decider jr

Answer 1

No that is all on Bush. He has had years to get this war right.

Answer 2

and what is the reason for not having them by now.

you behave as if the war were just beginning and not in it's fifth year.

your blame game rings hollow - and america hears the intrinsic weakness in your 'question.'

but tell me - why do cons play political funding with our troops anyway - i do wonder.

bush has signed over 800 signing statements that basically say 'i will sign this law, but won't abide by it if i don't feel like it' - why is this different.

after you're done NOT being able to answer the above comments - you can then tell me why a NON-BINDING RESOLUTION should even warrant a veto when our troops are at stake.

oh and then you can tell us all why - after over four years - war spending bills are still considered 'emergency spending.'

don't expect a single con in the entire nation to address these adult points.

cons 'play' at war.

they are the only in american history to cut taxes during wartime - but now will lecture us all about what is right and wrong.

Answer 3

that's funny you are using insults to strengthen your nonexistant argument. It's called a shame culture. That's why you're all bulimic, addicted to meth and insecure. Because you call eachother cowards and traitors all the time. One day you might believe the hate you spread and we will have another civil war.

They've been talking about that armour much longer than bush's current shame-scapade. So you can't blame it on the dems.

In all reality, as a former strategy gamer. Jeeps aren't armoured vehicles. If i wanted everyone in armoured vehicles i would have just sent a bunch of tanks. And believe me i've tried it, the best results come when you learn how to use tanks and infantry in coordination. Jeeps are fast and use less fuel (you say i shouldn't be concerned about fuel, who's going to pay for it and what do i do when i've wastefully used it all.)

Answer 4

What on earth are you talking about? Do you expect us to believe that delivery of armored vehicles has been delayed because of a bill that is going to be vetoed? Do you expect us to believe that vehicles set to be delivered now have not already had funds appropriated for them, or are you saying that this whole thing has been so horribly badly managed that we are hand to mouth desperately trying to scrape together nickels and dimes to buy some bullets? Give me a freakin' break!!

Answer 5

The troops not having proper equipment has long been an issue in the Iraq War. Bush was and is responsible.
Try again. Be a good commie for Nazi daddy bush.

Answer 6

The Bush Administration was warned during the pass down between Administrations. His people chose to ignore what was given to them. Did you know that he planned to invade Iraq before the election in 2000?

Answer 7

Please explain to me how the money the President is seeking now has to do with what should have already been prepared for? When the time comes to pay for this fiasco, it will also be the dems fault.

Answer 8

It's pretty obvious to most people with a room-temperature IQ that the Democrats are playing politics, and have the majority of Americans read all wrong.

The question is, what will it take for them to realize how idiotic, cowardly, and traitorous they actually appear to be to the majority of Americans. Or, perhaps they already have. I notice that Pelosi has been really quiet since the Syria trip. Perhaps she realizes she flirted with the noose.

Answer 9

Dems hate the troops

Answer 10

They don't have the right equipment now!!! Bush sent them off to war without the right equipment!!!