All those people against the war say that Bush should be impeached. Yet last i checked Hillary voted for the war so should she be impeached too?
2007-04-28 11:36:42 · 19 answers · asked by iceblendedmochajavo 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
The CONs who presented the evidence were Slick Willie and his staff, Daddy Bush and his staff, Ronaldus Magnus and his staff,,, Yes, every president who had any knowledge of Hussein and Iraq, and islam in general since America began has known the middle east has always been a powder keg of insane disrespect for life, especially Christian and Jewish life. Some one had to do something and W happened to be the only one in recent decades to try to do enough-- then the democrats decided to play politics with our lives and our security so much that you cannot still be certain who is right. Well , I know that W is right on this one, and; Hillary was right to be with him. She should have stayed on his side on the war , because ; she showed herself to be just another chickenshit waffler saying anything to try to get elected.
2007-04-28 11:57:01 · answer #1 · answered by mr.phattphatt 5 · 3⤊ 6⤋
all the info contained in the international would not get Bush impeached . The congress and Bush all artwork for others and its not the human beings . in the experience that they keen to get rid of Bush it would want to ensue in a second . If the completed conflict develop right into a BS tale from the get bypass then human beings might want to seem in to why 9-11 got here about and then perchance who's profiting and then perchance some very wealthy controlling human beings might want to be uncovered and those wealthy inbred blue bloods from Europe might want to be very unhappy about that . So Bush will stay .
2016-12-05 00:58:06 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can't impeach a Senator, per the Constitution.
2007-04-29 12:49:20 · answer #3 · answered by jdkilp 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Look up Impeachment. Then look up the Crimes that Congress has indicted Bush for then look up the times it has come up for vote. Then look up the amount of time it would take to do something like this versus the time he has left. First look up impeachment. You obviously have no idea what it means.
2007-04-28 15:45:10 · answer #4 · answered by Jimfix 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
That will never happen . But Hillary's prints are on enough to keep her real busy for the next 25 to life .
2007-04-29 18:11:24 · answer #5 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
She shouldn't be elected.
Any politician who goes against the Constitution, no matter what political party, should be impeached, period.
2007-04-28 12:14:42 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Technically she didn't! She voted for a resolution not a true declaration to go to war! Although it was as close as you can get and not actually declare war, legally it wasn't a declaration to war! I guess it depends on how close you like to split hairs!
2007-04-28 18:20:11 · answer #7 · answered by Jake 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No-if she becomes President and gets us into another stupid war then we can talk impeachment.
2007-04-28 13:32:37 · answer #8 · answered by It is what it is 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Sorry Javo. She can't be "impeached". She would have to be "recalled" in a special election.
LOL
2007-04-28 12:07:32 · answer #9 · answered by chuck_junior 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Um....That would mean everyone who is for the war should be impeached.....
(well said PurpleFlerple)
2007-04-28 11:55:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋