What is your view on embryonic stem cell research??

Question

Do you think there should be federal funding for stem cell research? Do you think stem cell research can help save lives? Do you think stem cell research kills unborn lives? AND WHY??

Answer 1

Yes, there should be funding. Yes, the research does save lives and no, it will not be responsible for unborn lives.

Answer 2

It is not necessary to use aborted fetuses. Embryonic stems cells can be found in the umbelical cord. The only stem cell research that has been promising is cells from adults. It's a gimmick to get the government to pay. If private industry wants to do the research then fine but I do not think funding research should be the responsibility of the government

Answer 3

I certainly think they should fund heavily for the stem cell research, it would save so many lives. Those Republicans aren't what they try to make people think they are just a bunch of nuts. If you take those embryo's that they throwing in the trash and save and help people and disease's, save their lives is a disgrace to the human race. We need funding for this research but as long as a crazy Republican is in the White house you can stick a fork in it, their trying to act religious. They better read about the 10 Commandments and repeat them to themselves because they have broken everyone of them that means the whole caboodle of Republicans, their a bunch of freaks of nature.

Answer 4

Yes. If we can spend untold billions on a crazy war that's killing thousands of people, then we can find a few hundred million to spend on the prospect of saving or improving many lives.

The research looks promising, but there are no guarantees. They can take the cells from unused embryos that would otherwise wind up as medical waste.

Answer 5

Studies have shown that there is no additional knowledge learned from aborting new life than can be gotten from adult stem cell or even placenta cell research, and you don't have to kill the adult or baby. You can wait for the birth and take the cells from the placenta after it is discharged.

Answer 6

Embryonic? Expensive and useless. Embryonic has done nothing. Other stem cell research is proving useful. So, why pay for what doesn't work?

=

Answer 7

i've got in no way rather been against abortion or stem cellular examine. i assume i've got faith abortion is incorrect I purely think of human beings would desire to have the skill to make the alternative for themselves. As for stem cellular examine, I help it yet i think of the fetuses would desire to be donated particularly of offered so as that folk dont have motivation to get abortions skinny king they might get money for it. I advise if the fetues is ineffective you would be able to to boot placed it too sturdy use and a possibility help others.

Answer 8

Well DUH, of COURSE IT KILLS. JUST LIKE ABORTION.

How does ANYONE not get that????

I'm sure it can help save lives, but so can taking guys off death row and using them for experiments. It doesn't mean we should DO IT!

What's next, cloning? Need a new heart, let's grow one. Some terrorist beheaded you? NO PROBLEM, here's a new HEAD! Married to LORENA BOBBITT! Don't sweat it, here's another NEW HEAD!!

MASECTOMY? NO MORE! How many boobs do you want? And what size, we can custom build them to your specs!

The only thing science is doing that I agree with is researching evolution. Other than that, this DR. FRANKENSTEIN CRAP HAS GOTTA STOP!!

WE ARE NOT GOD!

Answer 9

For it. For the United States to stay economically viable we must embrace new technology and continue to pioneer on the scientific front.