Why do democrats refuse to support the war against terrorists?

Question

they get so mad when its brought up. they say its political, lol, they dont support their country and they want people not to notice. we are noticing. we are noticing.

Answer 1

Why would they support a war against themselves?

Answer 2

Am sure the people of Iraq see the US as the terrorists...anyway, how can you say the Dems do not support the war? The new bill gives Bush everything he wants, all the money Bush asked for plus an extra $9 billion for the support of the troops, extra money for veteran care after the troops return from Iraq, and a needed way out of the mess that Bush has created. GW should be thanking the Dems for the way out, otherwise the disaster that is Iraq will be GWs only lasting historical event.

Answer 3

Iraq is nothing more than a large "Paintball Battlefield" with US Troops as part of the playing field.

Just as the USA has the CIA, according to Wikipedia at the following link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Intelligence_Agency
"The third function of the CIA is as the hidden hand of the U.S. government, by engaging in covert operations at the direction of the President."

It is well known that almost every other country has their own secret agencies which do their own covert operations for their own countries.

So with all the various covert operations being run in Iraq on the Iraq "Paintball Battlefield". The only differences are that when you get hit you don't always get up, that the US Soldiers and Iraqi civilians are in play but you can't tell who is who because they all are using the same color Paint, "Blood Red".

When we leave there will not be any reason for the other countries to do covert operations there just to keep us there and not focus on how much damage this Bush Administration has done to the planet, our economy, our constitutional rights, the corruption within the government agencies.

All the real generals have retired because they won't take part in the Iraq war. The ones left got where they are because they are will to cheat, kill and lie. NOT because they are good leaders.

This country used to have the best of almost everything but I am sorry to say there is no longer Honor, Respect and Truth in any part of the government nor any report that they put out.

Federal Prosecutors have given immunity to an illegal drug smuggler to convict Border Security Agents from doing thier jobs.

The Department of Injustice has fired attorneys for investigating corruption.

The Mexican Attorney General has shown his contempt to the Congress of the US by his lack of cooperation and evasive answers. That man has no idea how wrong he is.

THE WORLD'S REAL TERRORISTS ARE THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION.
Skull & Bones members want hate, death & discord.

Answer 4

Why do you believe one can fight and win a war against terrorism with out addressing the underlying issues that foster terrorism? Terrorism is not solvable by military means alone. Its also a political problem and this needs to be a multi party , multi national effort. You are also mistaken. I don't support THIS president or THIS administration.
I DO support this REPUBLIC and the CONSTITUTION.
Not Bush.
If you want to address patriotism, then ask yourself how this " war" on terror serves the national interest or the Constitution.

Answer 5

They did support the war against bin ladin.. he was the terrorist that harmed us. Then they supported the lies Bush told us about Iraq. What they do not support is our people dying in a man made civil war.. manufactured by the Republicans to justify the lies that got us there.

We all want to fight terrorism.. but we cannot as long as we are playing policeman in a country that is in the middle of a civil war we enabled.

Why can't the Cons understand this.. what is so hard about it. And stop saying stupid things like the Dems do not support our troops, do not want to fight terrorism... if is just more lies.. something they seem to do very well.

Answer 6

Democrats are the only ones who DO suport fighting terrorism.

Note--we have not objected to the war in Afghanistan--which is where the terrorists are.

But we do object to Bush's unjustified invasion of and occupation and destruction of Iraq--which was not a threat (no WMD) and had no ties to the terrorists.

Fighting doesn''t make you a patriot--fighting the real enemy does. Asking American soldiers to die for a lie is unpatriotic.

Answer 7

The war is no longer a fight against terrorism, but a war for American doctrine.

As history will inevitably repeat itself, this "war" on terrorism will end only in unnecessary causalities. It's all political propaganda in the name of money and power.

I think our tax dollars are best suited elsewhere...maybe, in our education system? Just a thought.

Answer 8

I'm a Democrat. I support the war on terrorism. That's why our troops are in Afghanistan.

I don't support the occupation of Iraq. It has _nothing_ to do with the war on terrorism, and never did.

Answer 9

I applaud this decide and desire greater will save on with and face up to help the regulations already on the books on a similar time as extending the rights to the state and native governments to verify and act upon this occasion of illegals. The Feds do no longer do their jobs, even nevertheless the regulation is it appears that evidently spelled out for them to maintain on with. As an company, that's unlawful for me to verify if an worker is criminal or unlawful. we are required to fill out the I-9 style, this is then used to help we've performed our jobs of checking criminal status and INS is now the decide. On one hand, American human beings think of we organisation vendors all are out to hire illegals. without the administration and means to verify if one is fairly unlawful, we can not hearth this worker regardless of if he admits to being unlawful. in straightforward terms the Fed. govt can verify that. we seem at their pretend SS taking part in cards, green taking part in cards, watch them declare 9 dependants @ 20 yrs old and be attentive to whilst gazing them, there's a great opportunity they're unlawful, yet we can not teach it and it is not any longer our place, in accordance to the Fed. govt. those workers whinge with regard to the minimum quantity taken out of their exams contained in certainly one of those SS, by using fact they have claimed such particularly some dependents, they pay little or no state or federal earnings tax, have not have been given any drivers licenses, no coverage and on and on. I call this crap. The states could desire to connect mutually and create law which may be used via state/community governments and companies. greater over, the individuals could desire to connect mutually and face up to our very own government and say "adequate"! DO WHAT we are saying!

Answer 10

Many Democrats support the war on terror and do their utmost not to give aid and comfort to the enemy. (Of course, I'm not referring to Harry Reid, Barak Obama, and Nancy Pelosi) There is a fight for direction within the Democratic party. Unfortunately, the lunatic fringe of the party has seized control and the old-school -yesterdays-breakfast-70s-presss toadies have pandered to them and to their interests (which are the same interests). The elitist liberal viewpoints of John Kerry and others of that ilk are completely in sync with the knee-jerk stuck on stupid reactionism of a pampered press corps force-fed on liberal bromides and utopian fantasies. Joe Lieberman's my kind of Democrat and look what the lunatic fringe of the party did to him. The fact that Lieberman got elected in spite of all the pressure that was put upon him by Ned Lamont's billionaire supporters is proof that there are many democrats who will not sell America out to buy or beg a little extra time from the headcutters and the terrorists and the madmen who suppress women, embrace fascism in the name of religion, and tolerate no freedom of thought.

Answer 11

because "terrorism" is not a country. This is a problem that should be dealt with by domestic civil legal action, ie police, border patrol. NOT the military. don't support our country huh? lol thats funny. I believe our country was built on differing opinions and with laws that protected those opinions.

Get it straight, i support my country, NOT this administrations politics, perhaps it sould do you some good to realize that W is an american, not AMERICA, hes just another person with ideals, and though you may agree or diagree with him, you are not disagreeing with this COUNTRY, you are diagreeing with a MAN.
In fact the ability to agree or disagree is what this country is all about

perhaps it is you who are unamerican