If you go by what the White House does then Getting troops killed on extended tours for little reward = Support.
Trying to bring troops home to their families alive and healthy = treason and desertion of the troops. If your not willing to sacrifice the young men and women of this country in the name of the President, then you are giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
2007-04-28 10:15:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by capekicks 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gosh... a rapid examine of the Congressional minutes would not practice any military pay-cuts interior the final decade, nor any plans FOR a pay-decrease... so a million/2 of you question is going precise out the window. somebody mentioned Congress contraptions the funds... they seem to be a million/2-precise... they approve the President's funds requests, and then the President signs and warning signs the funds. President Bush might, for my area veto ANY funds that secure military pay-cuts. and don't blame it basically on Republicans... Democrats voted for authorization of tension in Iraq additionally. And the army became downsized by using an 8 year Democratic administration from 1992-2000. If we had the troops of 1992, we would be in much extra perfect shape.
2016-12-29 13:44:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, there is NO PAY CUT! The military pay scale is approved and funded and no cut is planned.
As for extending their stay, that is a tactic to try and overcome the shortfall of personnel. Recruiting in the military has fallen so much that troop levels can't be maintained without extending deployments. Imagine that! People not willig to go into an unjust war? How dare they!
2007-04-28 10:14:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by afreshpath_admin 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it's not, but that's what happens when you choose a Democratically run congress and senate.. They can't make a wise decision based on the needs of our military, instead they use their money and power hungry agenda's get in the way to make Bush (Republican) look like the bad guy so they can gain total control... Pretty Sick.
2007-04-28 12:09:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dude, you watchin the WAHWAh librats network or what?
Where you get such stupid crap?
I am so sorry but in America we support OUR TROOPS!
whether we agree or not! I think President George W Bush has more knowlege and know how when it come up to war and Iraq than YOU!
I am sorry but that's how i feel.
Why do libtards always cut and run? why do they say things like that they like different people (divirsity) when they all yell and can't ascept george bushes point of view?
Explain THAT!
2007-04-28 10:15:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Higher pay and honor must be given to the soldiers in Iraq because it will be their only consolation for the sacrifice that they did for the country.
2007-04-28 10:11:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's the ONLY way! Isn't it great how much more money everyone is making off the Iraq war, except those little pee ons who are actually doing the fighting?
2007-04-28 10:16:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow Bush did that all by himself and congress had nothing to do with it. Our public schools are failing and liberals are the proof
2007-04-28 10:11:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Bush is the style,he is the .do not lose hope ,VICTORY in Iraq,will come.no thanks to blue starters,thanks to the greatest president in history.hail to the chief,lord Bush.
2007-04-28 13:44:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by freepress 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nice user name... seems appropriate given the question.
A little hypocritical to charge a group of people for attacking you in forumns.... and then attack them in a forumn.
2007-04-28 10:11:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋