They always assume EVERYTHING is our fault! They project their self-hatred onto America, saying we must've bombed ourselves on 9-11. They assume that every real threat to national security is "scaremongering", yet they jump aboard the secular armageddon of global warming which doesn't even have full credibility in the scientific world. Why? Because they love to admit that global warming is their own fault (self-flagellating) and they deserve punishment (must pay carbon credits and buy carbon insurance). They always assume we deserve punishment around the world, something the world is more than happy to dole out. They always think we must timidly approach enemies to "make nice" as if that has ever worked (not). Confidence scares them! And the FAKE ALTRUISM they exhibit is disgusting! Sheryl Crow rides around in a "biodiesel bus" a huge luxury coach which spews out JUST as much CO2 as a regular bus, lecturing college students on global warming when she has NO science degree.
2007-04-28
08:03:59
·
4 answers
·
asked by
SQD
2
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
There is no difference between Democrats and religion.
They both believe in Armageddon, and that we will pay for our sins, and they both use SHAME to control their masses.
2007-04-28
08:04:57 ·
update #1
PS I have never listened or watched FOX this is my own viewpoint from having listened to Democrats. They hate themselves, and since they are Americans they hate America as well. They would be too ashamed to have any pride.
2007-04-28
08:13:49 ·
update #2
To MEMO Please provide ONE SINGLE REFERENCE in a valid scientific journal which equates how much reduction in CO2 it will take to achieve thermal cooling of the Earth.
Waiting.
And when you're done, explain how the earth warmed after the last six known ice ages, and why ice core samples show a reverse CO2/warming correlation, and why Mars sith 95% consisten CO2 atmosphere is warming the same as earth, and why the Royal Acad. Sci just published an article about cosmic rays and cloud seeding leading to earth's thermal effects (which was not taken into account prior) and why there IS NOT CONSENSUS about CO2 causing globalw arming---it may be the result of it, and why solar fluctuations were not factored in (when ancient people even knew this and counted sunspots to know how the weather would change).
You give one reference about CO2 reduction and global cooling. Waiting.
There are none.
2007-04-28
08:38:13 ·
update #3