Do Con Repubs have a better alternative to abortion?

Question

How many children will already be living off the state if abortion was banned?
Do Repubs really believe that there are enough adoptive homes for the million babies each year being aborted?
.... a huge percentage of them being hard to adopt black children?

So if they are against poor mother's on welfare who have no other way to get by, and
they are agaisnt abortion,


Who in the WORLD do they think will pay for the MASSIVE numbers of children in foster care or wards of the state?
So, have the child, and let it starve or put it up for adoption, if there is no one left to adopt out, give them to the government to raise? How much does THAT cost?

And finally DO YOU REALLY HAVE A BETTER SUGGESTION FOR WOMEN SEEKING AN ABORTION THAN
"YOU SHOULD HAVE KEPT YOUR LEGS CLOSED, WHORE?".

Is that what Jesus would say,
being that his own mother was knocked up out of wedlock? hmmm?

burke23, it would have really helped if you read my entire question,

It's too late, the deed is done, the pregnancy is already happened, it happens ALL the time,
What do you suggest?

You cons obviously have no solutions at all,
you are not reading teh question,
you are not coming up with an answer.
you are just running your mouth, bashing the poor, hating women
just like Jesus would do.

Right On Stony.

Divine conception>>>>LOL.... this is why you have no credibility,

you believe in the supernatural,

So it would make sense that you believe poor women can pray for their child's food and a roof over their heads.

Rick N: It WAS an issue a hundred years ago! Families were having 10 - 15 kids and many of them were dying!!!!!!!

They were all poor, dirty, desperate and starving on the streets.

Rick N: It WAS an issue a hundred years ago! Families were having 10 - 15 kids and many of them were dying!!!!!!!

They were all poor, dirty, desperate and starving on the streets.

Answer 1

Do they have a better alternative? Yeah, it's called get your girlfriend pregnant in high school, have a shotgun wedding, get divorced three years later because you met some other chick in a bar and got her pregnant later in the evening, finally meet the love of your life at a church social and "connect" because you're both missing the same teeth. Next, get HER pregnant and live happily ever after in poverty while speaking passionately with your friends at the local diner about the "sanctity of marriage" and "family values" as you shove another piece of pie into your fat 60 pound overweight face. Then in your twilight years, you're a guest on Jerry Springer with your son and daughter who tell you they're in love and they don't care what anybody thinks and she's pregnant with your grandchild/nephew who naturally, won't be aborted but will grow up instead to play Mozart flawlessly while eating crayons.

Answer 2

Abortion seems like a horrible solution to one of society's worst problems.

Obviously the state needs to get involved in deciding who can and who can't have children. Nobody has a right to bring a child into the world until they can pass a qualifying exam. Like you need to prove you can afford to raise a child. Or you need both parents to sign a consent form saying they will take responsibility for caring and raising this child.

Its ridiculous that poor uneducated people will have 4, 5 or 6 children by the time they are 30 years old, and have to raise these children alone with little or no help. Of course these children will have immense problems trying to break the cycle of poverty. Something has to be done and abortion isn't working.

Abortion does not answer society's population problems. In fact, it just creates more. Its time to look to some real solutions.

Answer 3

It's called responsibility. It comes with being an adult and making mature decisions. There are risks and consequences with having sex and you need to think about them before you get pregnant, not after. If she feels she is not capable of raising a child right now then she should not be having sex right now. It's not right to go and do what we want in life, then take an innocent child's life just to save us the hardship of raising it. Jesus would never condone an abortion. He would expect her to make the morally correct decision and become a responsible parent.

Answer 4

At some point one has to acknowledge that an individual will not take personal responsibility of their sexuality. Their sexual piping should be clipped for both the male & female side.

I can already hear the Left on this solution. I'm being called a racest already. Look I'm saving them time to go to the clinic to get it aborted, the cost of birth control & even to remember to use it.

Answer 5

I wish that people raised their kids right. So there aren't 12 year olds getting pregnant. Most con repubs want the kids to be cared for, but we want the damn parents to be responsible. It's sad people can't take care of themselves. so sure lets kill the babies, keep abortions legal, becuase no one ever regrets it, and yeah. There has to be a better way.

Answer 6

Yes, birth control can come cheap. Adoption is an option, go to prochoice.com for details. Of course being accountable and responsible is an option, but you dont seem to be that type. Human embryologists agree that life starts at conception. So do you really support mass murder? Like it or not, abortion is legal murder. You may think Im closeminded, but Im not. I have done my research and I have looked at both arguments. Abortion as birth control should not be legal. Rape and health complications are one thing, mone issues and young age are another, especially when there are alternatives.

Look in the Bible, Mary wasnt 'knocked up'. Jesus was God's child through a spiritual conception, which was why Jesus was superhuman.

Answer 7

What's wrong with adoption? Have you noticed all the people out there who want to adopt? And if ever there was a good reason for well fare this would be it, not some dope smoking lib who can't get a job. And Jesus would never say kill an unborn baby.

Answer 8

How about we take all of the crack whores and give them hysterectomies instead of killing innocent babies. how about we take all the poor mothers on welfare give them hysterectomies also and send there butts back to work.
If they had any since of self worth, and any morals, They would know better. Most are a bunch of lazy sluts who want to sit around and pop out kids so they can live off the tax payers money and welfare. Get a life.

And yeah Mary was as you say knocked up out of wedlock, but Jesus wasn't aborted either.

Answer 9

It's called KEEPING YOUR LEGS SHUT. If you can't handle the responsibility of a child then you need to either not have sex or use protection.

Before you pro-choice morons chime in with "what if the girl is raped?", I'll tell you: Put the child up for adoption instead of killing it! It's not the baby's fault you got raped!

Answer 10

My solution is girls who are not able to have kids not have sex in the first place. This problem does not contain an easy fix. The supposed solutions you offer do not address the problem: females are having sex, which lead to pregnancy, and they are not responsible enough to handle this. You have to address that females are behaving (having sex) in an irresponsible way and not mature enough to take the consequences (having a child).

Having sex is not a right that comes without responsibility.