If evolution still continues, why there are no new species exist?

Question

Is it possible that a 4^300000 probabilities human's DNA molecule exists only because of a chance?
Why does a living coelacanth still exists? Shouldn't all of them evolute to amphibi?
If there's no mutant fertile even sex between the same mutant doesn't give any offspring then how does one species evolute to another?
What is the link between plantae and animalia?
Why the biogenesis do not occur again now as it did a few million years ago?
if evolution theory is right we should have a solid (continue) chain of species evolution process not a discrete one.

Answer 1

Nice probability, where did you get that from? Even remote probabilities can occur given enough time. Coelacanth is well-suited to its niche and didn't need to change (nothing to adapt to). Some of the offspring may have changed and adapted to new environments, but it wasn't necessary. Some mutations do not effect fertility, some do. Evolute isn't the word. Do you mean evolve? The species is our defintion, animals are constantly changing and adapting. Some even bear few resemblances to their grandparents. Plants and animls are linked in the web of life even now and there are many organisms that give us a little trouble deciding whether they are plants or animals. You question why biogenesis occurs, it does You maybe mean abiogenesis? The earth is a very different place so an abiogenesis would have to occur in a different manner than before. A virus is an interesting little thing, teetering on the edge of lfe giving us a peek at abiogenesis, it may be occuring a lot more than you think.
The "tree of life" cannot be expressed as a chain, linear and continuous. More like a handful of trees, branching thousands/millions of times. Crossing, splitting, fusing, and many other convolutions. There is nothing linear about it so looking for a continuous line is ridiculous and futile.

Answer 2

New species do exist

Even 4^300000 probabilities (what kind of probability expression is this anyway) occur given enough time

A living coelacanth is obviously a genetically superior type of fish that has survived in its environmental niche for 410 million years.

Its offspring may have evolved (not evoluted) into amphibians but it is obviously well adapted and its line has continued.

Crocodiles also have a long genetic history.

They aren't pokemon and they don't become something else by the process of evolution.

Evolution occurs with the process of alterations of a species DNA. Do some reading. Read the wiki page.

I'm beginning to think that you are the link between plantae and animalia

Biogenesis is the process of life forms producing more life forms. It is occurring now. It is probably occuring in a slightly different way to the way it was a few million years ago, but it is nevertheless occuring.

Which evolution theory are you talking about? Read about punctuated equilibria. The "species inbetween" are the ones that died out and left no fossil record.

Answer 3

1. Even if the probability of humans coming into existance is as low as you say it is (I honestly don't know what kind of probability you made up there. It seems like you understand math as well as you understand science).
2. Coelacanth exists because they're suited to their environment. And evolute is a made up word (kinda like your brain).
3. This isn't a question. It's a series of jumbled up words.
4. Have you heard of the sea? It has a lot of animals, such as coral, sponges, etc. that are very much like plants, except that they are, indeed, animals, with digestive tracts and everything. You should check the sea out. (It's that big wet thing on the edge of the Earth. I'm assuming you still think the world is flat).
5. Creating new species is not a magical event that just occurs. It takes time- more time than humans can measure. Also, the big biogenesis events you must be thinking of (assuming you can think) occured after mass extinctions.
6. No, of course not. Animals go extinct (such as the mass exctinctions that have occured throughout history). Some species aren't able to compete in the environment, and disappear. Evolution doesnt occur in a straight line. It's more like a bush or a tree (do you even believe in trees?)
Now, do me a favor and answer a question: Why do you people ask questions like this, thinking you're going to fool us evolutionists, when you're just going to pick the answer that agrees with you, and ignore all the rest. You're clearly not trying to learn anything, so just leave us alone. Seriously though, answer my question. I just don't understand it.

Answer 4

i've got self assurance in God yet your argument against evolution is incorrect, as all of us who has studied evolution knows that environmental replace does not happen constantly to that end that's impossible for evolutionary replace to happen constantly. Evolutionary replace can in straightforward terms be mentioned over a huge quantity of time, as proponents have self assurance. i've got self assurance that what's fairly stupid is the two non secular and nonreligious peoples perception that evolution and the super bang are someway motives for existence. Thats the biggest masterpiece of stupidity I even have ever encountered. What got here in the previous the super Bang? Is it no longer conceivable that evolution became into the physique of ideas for creation?

Answer 5

And I am guessing you meant abiogenesis, the production of life from inanimate material. The reason why that no longer occurs is because our atmosphere has become strongly oxidizing; it had been reducing when the first molecules of RNA were produced.

It seems you are concerned with macroevolution, but microevolution occurs every day as the gene pool shifts in allele frequency.

Answer 6

We don't see evolution in action because most species today have no need to evolve. You see rapid spurts of evolution when there is a need to evolve - this usually happens during major climate shift.

It's rare to see new species in animals, but in flowering plants we see new species all the time. They're called polyploids.

Answer 7

If evolution doesn't exist, why can scientists take two foxes with calm demeanors, breed them, and end up with a fox that acts more like a dog than a fox?

If evolution doesn't exist, why aren't Cro Magnon and Neanderthal's getting jobs? (FYI: The Geico commercial is a joke...)

Answer 8

There is no chance at all. My biggest question about evolution is why don't we see any thing that is inbetween? I am going to use this as an example. We have humans and we have apes but where is the species inbetween?