2007-04-28 02:53:05 · 12 answers · asked by jack 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
bating
2007-04-28 03:01:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Sri Lanka had won the toss they would have chosen to Bat. However, Australia won the toss and chose to bat first.
Defending champions Australia take on 1996 winners Sri Lanka in the grand finale of ICC Cricket World Cup 2007 at the Kensington Oval, Bridgetown, Barbados.
Australia ended with an exceptional 281/4 after 38 overs.
Sri Lanka were 148/3 after 24 overs.
Btw, Australia and Sri Lanka clashed in the final of the ICC Cricket World Cup 1996 at Lahore, which Sri Lanka won by 7 wickets.
2007-04-28 17:39:52 · answer #2 · answered by Hafiz 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
batting cuz....
This was a "Staged -drama" to award Australia the 2007 world Cup.
peolpe say it was More ....Like "WWF"- Wrestling Drama, everything went on according to the script.Whilst I am not that happy nesessarily, that Australia has won the World Cup.But I feel for Sri Lanka who never really had a decent chance to chase the Australian's total. A "Terrible end to a Disappointing" World Cup which has done nothing to advance the game.
I believe that Australia is fighting unit and would have not beaten Srilanka over 50 overs.But having the final reduced to 38 overs and then played in the dark was a Joke.
Both teams should be given a fair opportunity. I ask the Sri Lankan supporters who have been so outspoken in their dispair of Australian supporters (only gentemen-not some good 4 nothing hooligans) not to blame Ausies for this farce.
Instead Blame the ICC who seem to make up rules as they go along. Personally I would have liked to see the match moved to Sunday so that we could have a real game of cricket and not the joke that ensued.
AUS got WC 2007 , but SL played under pressure.When the Final was on the same time their Capital city was attacked by Terrorists.Rain took over the match.
Toss was the ridiculously deciding Facter.
Sri Lankan Players got the ....................
"Terrorists attacking Colombo"- news and Panicked ..
and that did not exactly helped to Lankan course to Victory
much.
Their(Cricketers) kids wives & parents all living in Colombo.
They dont know how far it affected ,towards > target & Bad light as well as Rain.
ICC must answer this question. I dont know these whyICC morons did not call this game to next day?
Utter non sense..!!
And even limit the final to 25 overs. ( In rainy day even kid knows dark will come soon in evening )
Begining ICC has to limit this game to 25 overs or call to next day.
But ICC & organizers want "Business" than the cricket game.
No doubt AUS is a good team.
So how SL or any other team can face "OZ" in bad lights?
This is the worst game I ever saw. Organisers had no common sense at all. they did according to the "Script" that Somehow or other "Australia must Win"
We were in no need of the victory so badly like Australia.
But we don't want like this stupid End either.
we did not bribe Umpires.we didnot Bragged either.
I again wish,Long live asian Cricket.
It can hurt ausies a bit ,i surely know.But ICC descrimination towards Asian players ? Can it be Pardened?
Dissapointing world cup Ever....2007
now every body jump to say dont blame
on these Noble Australians.
Oh phuleeeze .. gimme a break...!!..What a hypocracy,
what i can not understand is some Asian peolpe seems deaf & bling about this
when in Australia once Murali Was bowling The Racist australian crowd shouted that " no Ball"
Inthat match whenever Muralitharan took the Ball..
these so called Noble Australian Racist shouted
" no Ball"...." NO ball"...
they chanted all the while.
anybody ,objected?
I dont think so...Sir..I dont think so...Sir
Have any stood up against it ?SOME Fans..EH?
some cricket loving fans...
Parden them? you gonna say that?
when we now criticize them what they do?
They use dirty language..They use dirty language..
But.. they get away allthe time..why?
Cuz they R so good at acting Innocent.
Hail to Thee.. The Galent Sri Lankans(Lions)
Hip Hip Hurray
2007-05-01 15:55:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Though match has not yet started, Australia have won the toss and have dewcided to bat first.
2007-04-28 12:07:39 · answer #4 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sri lanka did not win the the toss Australia did and choose to bat
2007-04-28 10:33:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Batting.
2007-04-28 10:02:48 · answer #6 · answered by ri_ma_bo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lanka lost. They too wished to bat first.
2007-04-28 10:09:45 · answer #7 · answered by Shanil 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
without doubt: bat first. if they field, they should remmeber what happened to India in 2003
2007-04-28 09:57:34 · answer #8 · answered by SUNIL Raj 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hey! r u sleeping they have lost the toss .......
2007-04-28 12:03:18 · answer #9 · answered by rahul 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they should bat first
2007-04-29 12:47:52 · answer #10 · answered by rajesh 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋