2007-04-28 02:42:36 · 9 answers · asked by koushik d 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I'd like to be a rockstar, like The Residents, so I can be famous and anonymous at the same time.
2007-04-28 02:47:43 · answer #1 · answered by WMD 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would rather be a rock star because a rock star has longevity. For most sports, once you reach 35, you're history. That means you have no more job and no more income. On the other hand, a rockstar can carry on singing even in his twilight years.
2007-04-28 03:04:20 · answer #2 · answered by Nerdz R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sports star. I would not be sucked up by Hollywood. Each celebrity eventually turns to less clothing, lies, dishonesty, gossip, drugs abuse, etc. Publicity kills.
I still have a private life if i am a sports star. I have time for family and boyfriend.
2007-04-28 02:56:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Been in the music industry for 20 years...too many drugs. I'd choose sports if I had to do it all over again.
2007-04-28 02:47:59 · answer #4 · answered by Robert B 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rock star. Because I'm not athletic and I can sing up a storm.
2007-04-28 02:45:52 · answer #5 · answered by FaerieWhings 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
sports star cuz i love sports and rock music sucks to me
2007-04-28 02:46:56 · answer #6 · answered by redsox4life 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
rock star. just sounds better to me.
2007-04-28 02:47:17 · answer #7 · answered by psst.... its me 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
rockstar - more fun , more relax , more fan , more party , more award , more stlye and no drug-test.
2007-04-28 02:51:49 · answer #8 · answered by laziifrog 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
either 'cause any "bad" behavior" would be acceptable.
2007-04-28 02:47:15 · answer #9 · answered by edie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋