NAGPRA has been the center of debate for many issues. I am familiar with both sides of the argument and have my opinions, but want some supporting details of your thoughts on whatever side of the debate you stand.
If you do not know about NAGPRA, I encourgae you to research it. Otherwise this question is for serious comments only.
2007-04-28
02:27:53
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Voice of Liberty
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
I personally oppose the legistation.
1) Because it is discriminatory and works only for select special interest groups.
2) It is near impossible to enforce legitimately. I mean, in most cases remains are turned over to the first group that will claim them when the law clearly stses that proof of lineage is required. In most cases you cannot legitimately support your claim. It is like turning over the remains of a Catholic to the Jewish community for reburial simply because they have the same God.
3) In cases such as Kennewick Man, a skeleton dated 9,000 years old, five tribes made claim to his remains. How do you determine lineage on remains that old? More importantly why should NAGPRA impede the study of such remains that will benefit the knowledge of everyone?
2007-04-28
03:24:18 ·
update #1