if that's true for homosexuals, it's true for heterosexuals as well. the same discriminatory rules would apply in both cases. i guess that would make the bisexuals truly non-discriminatory.
2007-04-28 02:09:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jnr528 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
And am I to believe that you don't discriminate based on sex? If you won't have sex with someone because of their genitalia, you are sexually discriminating. If you think men shouldn't wear dresses and makeup, you are sexually discriminating. We cannot help what excites us sexually. Assuming you are a straight male, did you ever choose not to be attracted to men? Did you have to choose to be attracted to women? I don't think discrimination is the word you want here.
Regarding fascism: fascism values the organization above the organism. LGBT people are more the victims of fascism than the perpetrators. We don't go around taunting, ridiculing, beating and killing people because they are straight, nor do we strive to pass laws that will keep straights from enjoying their sexual orientation. So no, we are not fascistic. I hope you aren't either. Peace.
2007-04-28 10:43:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by J Maime 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sexual Fascism?
And what do you consider the fashion industry?
Isn't deciding to date within your own race sexual fascism?
Aren't Good Looks sexual fascism? (Why discriminate against trolls?)
This is perhaps the most unintelligent question I've read in weeks.
^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^ ^v^
2007-04-28 09:15:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by NHBaritone 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't think so. A straight guy only has sex with a girl, so how's that different from a gay gun only having sex with guy. As to friends, both gays and straights have friends of both sexes.
2007-04-28 09:43:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely.
2007-04-28 08:58:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by holly 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
No.
Your supposition is absolutely ridiculous.
2007-04-28 09:31:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by IndyT- For Da Ben Dan 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good insight. but probably not.
2007-04-28 08:54:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's immoral to be a fudgepacker in the first place.
2007-04-28 08:55:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
ummmm....huh?
2007-04-28 08:55:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋